<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MailFrontier Phishing Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gracie</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Erring on the side of caution would certainly not be considered a failure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erring on the side of caution would certainly not be considered a failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: werelord</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>werelord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I remember taking one a few months back (may have been the US one), and got one wrong.. The one I got wrong was one where I identified a legitimate email as a phishing attempt..  What percentage of that 93% that "failed" were ones that identified a legitimate message as a phishing attempt?? I don't necessarily count those as "failing"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember taking one a few months back (may have been the US one), and got one wrong.. The one I got wrong was one where I identified a legitimate email as a phishing attempt..  What percentage of that 93% that &#8220;failed&#8221; were ones that identified a legitimate message as a phishing attempt?? I don&#8217;t necessarily count those as &#8220;failing&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security Scene</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Scene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/mailfrontier-phishing-survey/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Phishing test results...F+&lt;/strong&gt;

A few weeks back Spamroll led your way to a test of your ability to identify phishing attempts. This test was sculpted around some UK products and services (so obviously it was designed for the British), but that didn't...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Phishing test results&#8230;F+</strong></p>
<p>A few weeks back Spamroll led your way to a test of your ability to identify phishing attempts. This test was sculpted around some UK products and services (so obviously it was designed for the British), but that didn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
