Comments on: Strength in 5 numbers http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/17/strength-in-5-numbers/ Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:34:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Michael Gracie http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/17/strength-in-5-numbers/#comment-97 Michael Gracie Fri, 18 Nov 2005 05:09:09 +0000 http://www.michaelgracie.com/strength-in-5-numbers/#comment-97 Brian, I don't think SpamLookup would react like that, as it works on a combination of keyword filtering, link identification and counts, and blacklists/whitelists. In essence, fighting the notions comment spammers need for publicity. I asked Peter what he thought, over at his site. Brian,

I don’t think SpamLookup would react like that, as it works on a combination of keyword filtering, link identification and counts, and blacklists/whitelists. In essence, fighting the notions comment spammers need for publicity. I asked Peter what he thought, over at his site.

]]> By: Brian McWilliams http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/17/strength-in-5-numbers/#comment-96 Brian McWilliams Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:23:27 +0000 http://www.michaelgracie.com/strength-in-5-numbers/#comment-96 Hi Michael, Could the 5-digit string possibly just be random data to foil spam-hashing algorithms? Kind of like the numbers some spammers put in their email spams for the same reason? Hi Michael, Could the 5-digit string possibly just be random data to foil spam-hashing algorithms? Kind of like the numbers some spammers put in their email spams for the same reason?

]]>