<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL pay-for-email battle hitting high notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/28/aol-pay-for-email-battle-hitting-high-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/28/aol-pay-for-email-battle-hitting-high-notes/</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thought Market</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/28/aol-pay-for-email-battle-hitting-high-notes/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/aol-pay-for-email-battle-hitting-high-notes/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Telcos back off, then go for the throat&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pressure against telco's plans to charge content providers for access to their pipes (again), has made some headway. Instead of charging Google and Apple's iTunes, they now want to charge their consumers different rates for access to those "premium...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Telcos back off, then go for the throat</strong></p>
<p>The pressure against telco&#8217;s plans to charge content providers for access to their pipes (again), has made some headway. Instead of charging Google and Apple&#8217;s iTunes, they now want to charge their consumers different rates for access to those &#8220;premium&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
