2 responses

  1.   mike king comments:
       

    Michael

    I meant to bring up your skidoo blog post, which I agree with 100%.
    Your notion that they don’t need to be kicked while down is refreshing
    when so much mob mentality and jealousy seems to bring out the worst.

    I have been messing around with blogs for awhile and met up with skidoo
    quite by accident. I’m not much for single content or targeted marketing
    but in my world there are no “accidents,” so decided to explore. While
    Not committing, I still got a ton of useful information from the webiteand
    that is a class act. I agree with Google, by the way, that websites disguised as informational but loaded with spam are not a legitimate way to bring products to pontial buyers. I would like to see more disclosure
    about why a site gets smacked. If the object is to improve the content,
    then a data base of actions and conclusions would be helpful to all.

    The way it is now, it feels like a sheriff is hiding behind trees with the
    express purpose of “nailing” offenders, rather than openly trying to improve their content. But, as I am learning, no one giant can control
    what the good citizen wants in content and advertising for long.

    Internet users are all more sophisticated as a result of free information.
    The latest political races for president have proven that the internet has a mind of its own and it will be heard. How different from the days when
    political parties controlled what voters wanted. The internet is evolutionary, along with everything else on the planet. Those who cling
    to the old ways will be left behind.

  2.   Michael Gracie comments:
       

    Agreed on all accounts.

Leave a comment