<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; acquisitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/acquisitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Is Google&#8217;s Proprietary Tech Stack Destroying Its Acquisitions?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/23/is-googles-proprietary-tech-stack-destroying-its-acquisitions/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/23/is-googles-proprietary-tech-stack-destroying-its-acquisitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=2356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Masnick makes great points in this regard, the best of which is (emphasis mine):
So, for startups whose strategy is to get acquired by Google (and, I should note, if you start with that strategy, you&#8217;re probably going to fail)&#8230;
I have no opinion on the specific matter.  But, just the other day a colleague [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Mike Masnick <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080717/2255221720.shtml">makes great points</a> in this regard, the best of which is (emphasis mine):</p>
<blockquote><p>So, for startups whose strategy is to get acquired by Google (and, I should note, <strong>if you start with that strategy, you&#8217;re probably going to fail</strong>)&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no opinion on the specific matter.  But, just the other day a colleague and I discussed the fact that since Google has such an enormous (and ongoing) investment in proprietary computing infrastructure, they might be vulnerable to &#8220;evolutionary jumps&#8221; in computing technology some time in the future.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/23/is-googles-proprietary-tech-stack-destroying-its-acquisitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the M&#038;A Market Hit Bottom?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/10/29/has-the-ma-market-hit-bottom/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/10/29/has-the-ma-market-hit-bottom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mergers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/10/29/has-the-ma-market-hit-bottom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Wall Street Journal:
With October ending in two days and the books closed on the final Merger Monday of the month today, it looks as if a rebound could be underway.
I imagine the rebound includes senior and sub financing term sheets that look like they&#8217;re from five years ago.  In other words, either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>From <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2007/10/29/has-the-ma-market-hit-bottom/">The Wall Street Journal</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>With October ending in two days and the books closed on the final Merger Monday of the month today, it looks as if a rebound could be underway.</p></blockquote>
<p>I imagine the rebound includes senior and sub financing term sheets that look like they&#8217;re from five years ago.  In other words, either deal pricing has come down, or we&#8217;ll see a lot of bankruptcies in just a few years time (as if we won&#8217;t already).</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/10/29/has-the-ma-market-hit-bottom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look for more deals in 2007</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/look-for-more-deals-in-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/look-for-more-deals-in-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mergers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/look-for-more-deals-in-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were a few M&#038;A deals in the security space during 2006.  If bankers have their way, we&#8217;ll see an acceleration of deal activity in 2007.   Why else would analysts be floating such an idea?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>There were a few M&#038;A deals in the security space during 2006.  If bankers have their way, we&#8217;ll see an acceleration of deal activity in 2007.   Why else would <a title="Security Analysts Predict More MNA in 2007" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2070631,00.asp">analysts be floating such an idea</a>?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/look-for-more-deals-in-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush is on to buy security companies</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/13/rush-is-on-to-buy-security-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/13/rush-is-on-to-buy-security-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/rush-is-on-to-buy-security-companies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Microsoft pushing further into the security space via niche acquisition and rebranding, I suspect we are going to see more and more M&#038;A activity to counteract the gorilla&#8217;s hunger.
The latest (via The Register), Secure Computing has purchased CipherTrust, a leader in messaging security.  This comes just as Microsoft and Yahoo IM networks converge, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>With Microsoft pushing further into the security space via niche acquisition and rebranding, I suspect we are going to see more and more M&#038;A activity to counteract the gorilla&#8217;s hunger.</p>
<p>The latest (via The Register), Secure Computing has <a title="Secure Computing buys CipherTrust | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/12/sc_buys_ciphertrust/" target="">purchased CipherTrust</a>, a leader in messaging security.  This comes just as <a title="Inside Windows Live Messenger:" href="http://messengersays.spaces.msn.com/" target="">Microsoft and Yahoo IM networks converge</a>, along with <a title="Technology News: Viruses &#038; Malware: Threats From Hackers 'Converging,' Researchers Say" href="http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/51709.html" target="">threats from hackers</a>.</p>
<p>Another - <a title="SurfControl snaps up BlackSpider | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.com/2006/07/13/surfcontrol_blackspider_buy/" target="">SurfControl gets BlackSpider</a>, which adds appliance-based on-demand network security to SurfControl&#8217;s software portfolio.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s two less deals for <a title="Spamroll: Will Microsoft kill the security sector?" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/06/29/will-microsoft-kill-the-security-sector/" target="">the so-called predators</a> to get hold of, but I doubt that will slow them down much.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/13/rush-is-on-to-buy-security-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
