<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/adobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Acrobat bug biggest of 2007!</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/06/acrobat-bug-biggest-of-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/06/acrobat-bug-biggest-of-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Acrobat Reader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[openoffice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TrueCrypt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/acrobat-bug-biggest-of-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that is saying something, since it is presently January 6th.  No, I&#8217;m not the one saying it - some security researchers are, and those researchers are implying it could be the biggest bug of the whole year (but I think that is only because they know Acrobat Reader has a huge install base, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Now that is saying something, since it is presently January 6th.  No, I&#8217;m not the one saying it - <a title="Adobe Flaw May Be 'Worst' Bug Of 2007 - Technology News by TechWeb" href="http://www.techweb.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=196801513">some security researchers are</a>, and those researchers are implying it could be the biggest bug of the whole year (but I think that is only because they know Acrobat Reader has a huge install base, and most people are too dumb to bother implementing a patch when it does arrive).</p>
<p>Adobe has been on a <a title="ADBE: Basic Chart for ADOBE SYSTEMS INC - Yahoo! Finance" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=ADBE&amp;t=6m&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=">decent streak</a> as of late, so no better time to try and kick them down.  The bright side of this is that it is free software we&#8217;re dealing with, so at least you didn&#8217;t pay to have your computer screwed up.</p>
<p>Note: Spamroll wins, however - a new category has been started - Software Bugs!  Report quirks at your leisure.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Speaking of <a title="OpenOffice patches 'highly critical' flaw | CNET News.com" href="http://news.com.com/OpenOffice patches highly critical flaw/2100-1002_3-6147501.html">free software in need of patching</a>&#8230;OpenOffice.  I need to do it too, OpenOffice being a great tool for parsing small database tables when readying for import - Excel for Mac does a crappy job at it.</p>
<p>UPDATE 2: Since I&#8217;m on a free software binge this morning (while the dog pesters me for a walk), Dr. Dobbs notes that the free <a href="http://www.ddj.com/dept/security/196801558">TrueCrypt encryption software is a hell of a way to thwart phishers</a>.  Check it out.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/06/acrobat-bug-biggest-of-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shuffling for different reasons</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/16/shuffling-for-different-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/16/shuffling-for-different-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BellSouth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LEC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Macromedia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Qwest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[telecomm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe and BellSouth are each laying off a whole bunch of people, but for different reasons.  In the first case, it is about managing new technologies (and keeping it in sync with the old); in the latter it is about not managing old technology (and separating it from the new).  Both serve their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Adobe and BellSouth are each <a href="http://www.redherring.com/article.aspx?a=14904" title="RED HERRING | Adobe, BellSouth Cut Jobs">laying off a whole bunch of people</a>, but for different reasons.  In the first case, it is about managing new technologies (and keeping it in sync with the old); in the latter it is about not managing old technology (and separating it from the new).  Both serve their purpose.<br />
<span id="more-198"></span><br />
In Adobe&#8217;s case, they <a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/acquisition.html" title="Adobe completes acquisition of Macromedia">picked up Macromedia</a>, and now they have Flash and Dreamweaver to deal with.  Both have become de-facto standards for web development; Dreamweaver will supplement Adobe&#8217;s strong presence in &#8220;hardcopy&#8221; publishing, and Flash will provide the web pizzazz the company has long needed.  The acquisition created complimentary lines, and Adobe should have no problem bundling them up, and pricing them appropriately for all the publishers, designers, and tinkerers out there who were buying pieces/parts of the original offerings anyway.  Many line managers, sales personnel, and a few engineers simply have to go.  But I think Adobe can maintain a one-of-a-kind image for some time to come.  For them, it is about positioning and growth.</p>
<p>BellSouth, like many other traditional local exchange carriers, has been slow to move.  Yes, they have DSL and mobile service, but I hardly call that progress.  All I hear is &#8220;package of these services,&#8221; &#8220;package of those services.&#8221;  Meanwhile, if you talk to someone working at one of these places, you shouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they haven&#8217;t heard of disrupters such as <a href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a> or <a href="http://www.vonage.com/">Vonage</a>.  Add to that list a newfangled product (according to them) called the voice-enabled instant messaging client (including ones being <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3529601" title="Now, You're Google-Talking on IM">offered by very big guys</a>), and maybe toss in a pinch of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimax" title="WiMAX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia">WiMAX</a>, and you have a recipe for trouble.  Of course, I&#8217;m not going to completely blame the organizations themselves; if the folks on the chopping block had the motivation to improve instead of going about happily cashing those fat (but wasteful) paychecks for the last few years, they would have seen the train&#8217;s headlight coming long ago.  The result would have been a lot of screaming for change, instead of what&#8217;s going to happen now - a lot of pinkslips.  Many line managers, sales personnel, and more than a few engineers simply have to go.  BellSouth isn&#8217;t a one-of-a-kind either.  For them (and their counterparts) it has been about holding onto &#8220;the last mile&#8221; - now it is about simply surviving.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/16/shuffling-for-different-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
