<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; airlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/airlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Airlines have nobody to blame but themselves</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fuel cost]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hedging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the midst of oil-mania, Southwest significantly hedged their fuel consumption.  Delta and American did not.
Guess who&#8217;s winning?
This is a management problem.  Hedging is NOT speculation - you shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;lose&#8221; because you hedge, as the cost of fuel should wind up fixed if the hedge is managed appropriately.  You determine your need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img src="http://www.southwest.com/images/ad_gallery/p_ad14.jpg" title="Southwest Airlines" alt="Southwest Airlines" class="alignright" border="0" height="150" width="120" />In the midst of oil-mania, Southwest significantly <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/07/16/airlines-the-oil-bubbles-winners-losers/">hedged their fuel consumption</a>.  Delta and American did not.</p>
<p>Guess who&#8217;s winning?</p>
<p>This is a management problem.  Hedging is NOT <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/search/?cx=011647838950087684899%3A1cxf6yucso8&amp;cof=FORID%3A11&amp;q=speculation&amp;sa=Search#952">speculation</a> - you shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;lose&#8221; because you hedge, as the cost of fuel should wind up fixed if the hedge is managed appropriately.  You determine your need for fuel, and figure out how that flows through to ticket price.  Then you purchase forward contracts for that fuel and fix your ticket price appropriately.  If fuel prices go up you take your gains on the contracts, which in turn offset your rising costs at consumption time.  If fuel prices go down, you lose on the contracts but your fuel price has fallen as you&#8217;re buying it.  Margin on your service stays the same, as you set your prices in advance.</p>
<p>Not hedging your fuel costs in this environment is the real speculation.  And I&#8217;ll add that those who do cover their butts have the addition perk of being able to raise their ticket prices (even if slightly) on the back&#8217;s of their competitors&#8217; misfortune without significantly effecting volume.</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/16/airports-amr-delta-biz-cx_tvr_0716airlines.html">Forbes says</a>: &#8220;The sky may not be falling for airlines just yet, but darker clouds could be just around the corner.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed (particularly if they don&#8217;t update their financial management tools to at least late 20th century levels).</p>
<p>UPDATE 2: Southwest turns its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/business/25air.html">69th consecutive profitable quarter</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec wants to fly high financially</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/14/symantec-wants-to-fly-high-financially/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/14/symantec-wants-to-fly-high-financially/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[James Beer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/symantec-wants-to-fly-high-financially/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, so does every other company, but in this case Symantec is taking it literally.  They&#8217;ve hired the CFO of American Airlines, Mr. James Beer.
I am sure Symantec has &#8220;high hopes&#8221; for Mr. Beer, but I don&#8217;t get the move.  Pulling an executive out of an industry (and a company) with vast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Of course, so does every other company, but in this case Symantec is taking it literally.  They&#8217;ve <a title="PRESS RELEASE Symantec Names James Beer Chief Financial Officer" href="http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=109688" target="">hired the CFO of American Airlines</a>, Mr. James Beer.</p>
<p>I am sure Symantec has &#8220;high hopes&#8221; for Mr. Beer, but I don&#8217;t get the move.  Pulling an executive out of an industry (and a company) with vast problems of its own isn&#8217;t exactly my idea of chasing success with success.  Symantec&#8217;s President <a title="Spamroll: To Spend More Time With The Family" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/01/25/to-spend-more-time-with-the-family/">recently and quietly resigned</a>, and the company <a title="Spamroll: Holding my tongue on Symantec" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/12/02/holding-my-tongue-on-symantec/">has lingering problems</a> that shouldn&#8217;t be there in the face of a burgeoning market for security products.</p>
<p>I have to wonder&#8230;is this move one to get someone on the team that is familiar with bankruptcy-related causes?  Because executives in the airline industry know bankruptcy well.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/14/symantec-wants-to-fly-high-financially/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
