<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Where did you say that oil came from?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/05/where-did-you-say-that-oil-came-from/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/05/where-did-you-say-that-oil-came-from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Canada is the largest exporter of oil to the US, is priming to double it&#8217;s output capacity, and of course is not a part of the lovable cadre called OPEC, then I have an extemporaneous question&#8230;
Why are we kissing the Middle East&#8217;s ass, instead of our friendly northern neighbors&#8217;?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>If Canada is the largest exporter of oil to the US, <a title="Instapundit.com - " href="http://instapundit.com/archives/028980.php" target="">is priming to double it&#8217;s output capacity</a>, and of course is not a part of the lovable cadre called OPEC, then I have an extemporaneous question&#8230;</p>
<p>Why are we kissing the Middle East&#8217;s ass, instead of our friendly northern neighbors&#8217;?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/05/where-did-you-say-that-oil-came-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your blog and your future</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/30/your-blog-and-your-future/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/30/your-blog-and-your-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the people I know who have weblogs are technology and marketing folks.  They have embraced the medium hoping to spread their mantra or help someone with a problem, and in some cases they get a few listeners or contribute a solution.  The rest aire differences, bash companies, talk about their significant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Most of the people I know who have weblogs are technology and marketing folks.  They have embraced the medium hoping to spread their mantra or help someone with a problem, and in some cases they get a few listeners or contribute a solution.  The rest aire differences, bash companies, talk about their significant others, what they ate for lunch yesterday, and spread nasty rumours about their political opponents.</p>
<p>The first group wants to be there, and understand the whats and whys of being there.  The rest may or may not understand that their words can be archived for eternity, subject to scrutiny, and even get them in hot water (<a title="Thought Market: Stupid move in a world of unlimited reach" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/09/08/stupid-move-in-a-world-of-unlimited-reach/">if they say dangerous things</a>).</p>
<p>Once someone calls you out, don&#8217;t expect to dance around the issue.  You said it, and now you have to pay for it.  And keep in mind that your audience comes to your blog to listen to ideas - they don&#8217;t care what you do for your day job.  And that audience could be anyone, anywhere.  Nobody will be particularly impressed by where you live, that is unless you are <a title="Blogger Blocked at U.S. Border" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1894227,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">crossing a border under questionable immigration auspices</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/30/your-blog-and-your-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Canadians weigh in on spam</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/03/real-canadians-weigh-in-on-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/03/real-canadians-weigh-in-on-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/real-canadians-weigh-in-on-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks back Spamroll questioned (along with CAUSE Canada) whether all the cute little stats saying email spam was slowing were on target (see Canadians Doubt the News Too).
Now more real users have weighed in on the matter over at ITBusiness.ca, and nobody stands corrected as of yet.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>A few weeks back Spamroll questioned (along with CAUSE Canada) whether all the cute little stats saying email spam was slowing were on target (see <a title="Spamroll: Canadians Doubt the News Too" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/canadians-doubt-the-news-too/">Canadians Doubt the News Too</a>).</p>
<p>Now more real users have weighed in on the matter over at <a title="ITBusiness.ca" href="http://www.itbusiness.ca/index.asp?theaction=61&#038;lid=1&#038;sid=58517">ITBusiness.ca</a>, and nobody stands corrected as of yet.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/03/real-canadians-weigh-in-on-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telus Phishing with common sense</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/21/telus-phishing-with-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/21/telus-phishing-with-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Telus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/telus-phishing-with-common-sense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was impressed that Telus of Canada was utilizing RSS to get their marketing message on the street (see RSS Marketing for more on how this works).  I was even more impressed that the message was a quick and dirty, common-sensical guide on avoiding phishing exploits.  Take a look at Gone phishing – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I was impressed that Telus of Canada was utilizing RSS to get their marketing message on the street (see <a title="RSS Marketing and Real-Life Marketing Experience" href="http://www.marketingstudies.net/">RSS Marketing</a> for more on how this works).  I was even more impressed that the message was a quick and dirty, common-sensical guide on avoiding phishing exploits.  Take a look at <a title="Gone phishing – forged e-mails, spoofs and scams | currents | Internet services | myTELUS" href="http://www.mytelus.com/internet/currents/article.do?pageID=currents_home&#038;articleID=1863067&#038;issue=">Gone phishing – forged e-mails, spoofs and scams - myTELUS</a>, and tell me what you think.</p>
<p>I think it is one more example of taking care of your users.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/21/telus-phishing-with-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadians Doubt the News Too</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/canadians-doubt-the-news-too/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/canadians-doubt-the-news-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stiffer penalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/canadians-doubt-the-news-too/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spamroll doesn&#8217;t believe that spam is slowing, and neither do the Canadians.  While there maybe some credence to the idea that they are simply ignoring it (mentioned earlier in Canadians Ignoring Spam&#8230;how dare they!), there is still some doubt regarding any trend.

CAUSE Canada shoots a lot of holes in the news, which they note [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Spamroll doesn&#8217;t believe that spam is slowing, and neither do the Canadians.  While there maybe some credence to the idea that they are simply ignoring it (mentioned earlier in <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/12/canadians-ignoring-spamhow-dare-they/">Canadians Ignoring Spam&#8230;how dare they!</a>), there is still some doubt regarding any trend.<br />
<span id="more-387"></span><br />
CAUSE Canada shoots a lot of holes in the news, which they note has been picked up by wires all over the place, in <a title="CAUCE Canada News Blog: March 13, 2005 Archives" href="http://cauce.ca/blog/archives/2005/03/13/index.html#001572">Canadian Spam Levels Dropping? I don&#8217;t _think_ so!</a>.</p>
<p>Spamroll agrees with the analysis, but you judge for yourself.  Particularly interesting was the dissection of the survey and its results, which note that just because users are receiving less spam doesn&#8217;t mean there isn&#8217;t more spam in the system.  In this case, we would have to give a few kudos to the anti-spam software providers (although we may already have given them our money), but that, again, doesn&#8217;t mean the problem is getting solved through stiffer legal penalties.</p>
<p>Note: Spamroll supports stiffer laws, when correctly implemented.</p>
<p>For more interesting commentary on this issue, check out <a title="Slashdot | Canadian Spam Levels - Up? Down? You Be the Judge" href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/13/2327252">Slashdot | Canadian Spam Levels - Up? Down? You Be the Judge</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/canadians-doubt-the-news-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
