<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; counterparty risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/counterparty-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The &#8216;Bigger They Are The Harder They Fall&#8217; bet (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/11/19/the-bigger-they-are-the-harder-they-fall-bet/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/11/19/the-bigger-they-are-the-harder-they-fall-bet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[counterparty risk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[credit default swaps]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Standard and Poors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=4225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The credit markets are unfriendly, even to the big guys.
Ken Griffin&#8217;s Citadel Investment Management just had its counterparty rating cut by S&#038;P:
The ratings were cut to BBB from BBB+ on the Kensington Global and Wellington funds, which tumbled about 40 percent this year. Further reductions are possible if the funds, which oversee $13 billion in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The credit markets are unfriendly, even to the big guys.</p>
<p>Ken Griffin&#8217;s Citadel Investment Management just had its <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=axLc1BT2ZXbA&#038;refer=home">counterparty rating cut by S&#038;P</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The ratings were cut to BBB from BBB+ on the Kensington Global and Wellington funds, which tumbled about 40 percent this year. Further reductions are possible if the funds, which oversee $13 billion in assets, don’t improve their investment returns, S&#038;P said today in a statement.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just a smidgen, although when applied across all trades probably isn&#8217;t small change.  But just to show <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/19/warren-buffett-berkshire-biz-wall-cx_lm_1118buffett.html">nobody is immune</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Spreads on insurance against a debt default by Warren Buffett&#8217;s triple-A-rated Berkshire Hathaway are trading about on par with that of the embattled General Electric and worse than Goldman Sachs and Citigroup.</p></blockquote>
<p>Note: with the amount of volatility in the air, the latter issue could work itself out very quickly.  As for the former, I just have to wonder how much stock folks put in S&#038;P decisions anymore.</p>
<p>UPDATE: More on the <a href="http://jeffmatthewsisnotmakingthisup.blogspot.com/2008/11/is-buffett-worried-no-but-somebody-is.html">Buffett bet</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/11/19/the-bigger-they-are-the-harder-they-fall-bet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can swaps rescue subprime?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/12/17/can-swaps-rescue-subprime/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/12/17/can-swaps-rescue-subprime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[counterparty risk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/12/17/can-swaps-rescue-subprime/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solution?  Or same speech, different day?
It&#8217;s a big market, and growing.  Nevertheless, you have to be good at playing &#8220;Who&#8217;s Your Counterparty.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Solution?  Or <a href="http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071217/REG/71214024/1023/OTHERVIEWS">same speech, different day</a>?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2007/11/12/nobody-saw-credit-problems-coming/">big market</a>, and growing.  Nevertheless, you have to be good at playing &#8220;Who&#8217;s Your Counterparty.&#8221;</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/12/17/can-swaps-rescue-subprime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Next Dominos: Junk Bond And Counterparty Risk</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/11/26/the-next-dominos-junk-bond-and-counterparty-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/11/26/the-next-dominos-junk-bond-and-counterparty-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[counterparty risk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[credit default swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/11/26/the-next-dominos-junk-bond-and-counterparty-risk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of this from someone who actually knows what they are talking about.
Side note: Hedge funds heavy on the sell-side will certainly have reason to hurt, but what about institutions who still think they&#8217;re safely hedged?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><a href="http://www.investorsinsight.com/otb_va_print.aspx?EditionID=619">More</a> of <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2007/11/12/nobody-saw-credit-problems-coming/">this</a> from someone who actually knows what they are talking about.</p>
<p>Side note: Hedge funds heavy on the sell-side will certainly have reason to hurt, but what about institutions who still think they&#8217;re safely hedged?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/11/26/the-next-dominos-junk-bond-and-counterparty-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
