<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Elliot Spitzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/elliot-spitzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Two &#8220;settlements&#8221; this week</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/15/two-settlements-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/15/two-settlements-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elliot Spitzer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/two-settlements-this-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it&#8217;s only Wednesday.  In the first, DirectRevenue (spyware distributor extraordinaire) settled with the State of Illinois.  No cash - just a little &#8220;changing of business practices.&#8221;  Right..we&#8217;ve seen that work before.
In the second, our good man Elliot Spitzer took a chunk of flesh out of an email marketing firm (as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>And it&#8217;s only Wednesday.  In the first, DirectRevenue (spyware distributor extraordinaire) <a title="DirectRevenue settles class action lawsuit | Spyware Confidential | ZDNet.com" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Spyware/index.php?p=792">settled with the State of Illinois</a>.  No cash - just a little &#8220;changing of business practices.&#8221;  Right..we&#8217;ve <a title="Spamroll: Is 180solutions turning around, or not?" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/02/28/is-180solutions-turning-around-or-not/">seen that work before</a>.</p>
<p>In the second, our good man Elliot Spitzer took a chunk of flesh out of an email marketing firm (<a title="Technology News: E-Marketing : Spitzer Settles With E-Mail Marketer" href="http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/49334.html" target="">as well as $1.1 million dollars</a>), for using collected email addresses without the addressees&#8217; consent.  Now we&#8217;re talking.<br />
<span id="more-1085"></span><br />
***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Make that three, if you call <a title="Haaretz Article" href="http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/694137.html" target="">going to jail for distributing trojan horses</a> a settlement (you could actually say &#8220;four,&#8221; if you take into account that this one was a husband and wife team).</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/15/two-settlements-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trailing adware - where do the breadcrumbs lead?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/05/05/trailing-adware-where-do-the-breadcrumbs-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/05/05/trailing-adware-where-do-the-breadcrumbs-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 21:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ask Jeeves]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Claria]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elliot Spitzer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gator]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grokster]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kazaa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Overture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/trailing-adware-where-do-the-breadcrumbs-lead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most in the online world have probably heard by now that Elliot Spitzer&#8217;s office is suing spyware company Intermix.  But, nobody has explained very clearly how spyware vendors make their money, so I will.  Spyware companies generally collaborate with their customer to deliver targeted advertising of their customers&#8217; products.  That is where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Most in the online world have probably heard by now that Elliot Spitzer&#8217;s office is <a title="Spamroll: Spitzer sues spyware company" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/spitzer-sues-spyware-company/">suing spyware company Intermix</a>.  But, nobody has explained very clearly how spyware vendors make their money, so I will.  Spyware companies generally collaborate with their customer to deliver targeted advertising of their customers&#8217; products.  That is where the whole spying thing comes in.  If you know the online user very well, even if the user doesn&#8217;t know you know them very well, then you can provide some assurance to the customer that their ad will be seen by someone that fits their target audience, and therefore their product demographics.  In summary, spyware companies get paid to deliver ads, but it doesn&#8217;t end there.<br />
<span id="more-582"></span><br />
Spyware and adware companies also leverage off of affiliates.  These affiliates place code on their websites, usually in the form of cookies, applets and downloadable software.  Affiliates get paid a cut of the spyware company&#8217;s revenue for each &#8220;client&#8221; they deliver that winds up seeing tons of popups.</p>
<p>There are a few folks out there that are betting that Spitzer understands all this, and that the Intermix suit <a title="Intermix is just the start :: AO" href="http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=10117_0_3_1_C">is just the beginning</a> of what could be a nasty battle reminiscent of the securities litigation of the last few years.  Everyone ended up <a title="Investment Bank Settlement | Regulators announce $1.4 billion settlement with Wall Street | Brokerage settlement" href="http://www.stockbroker-fraud.com/settle.htm">paying massive fines</a>, and then Spitzer went on to slam the mutual fund players and the insurance industry.</p>
<p>There could be some sizable players in all this mess as well.  Beyond the Kazaas and Groksters, and even the Gators (Claria), there are some major names that might wind up in Spitzer&#8217;s crosshairs.  Assistant District Attorney Justin Brookman pointed out that a lot of big advertisers use spyware companies - folks like Ask Jeeves and Yahoo! Search Marketing (Overture).  While some <a title="Yahoo! has minimal spyware, adware revs streams | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/04/yahoo_has_minimal_spyware_adware_revenues/">do not seem particularly worried about Yahoo! exposure</a>, I would not rule out anything with Elliot at the wheel.</p>
<p>But then again, I wouldn&#8217;t start dancing on any graves just yet either (due to this funny legal term called &#8220;settlement&#8221;).</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p><a title="� Ask Jeeves Responds to Spyware Accusations - Search Engine Journal" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=1669">� Ask Jeeves Responds to Spyware Accusations - Search Engine Journal</a></p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/05/05/trailing-adware-where-do-the-breadcrumbs-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spitzer sues spyware company</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/spitzer-sues-spyware-company/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/spitzer-sues-spyware-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elliot Spitzer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intermix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/spitzer-sues-spyware-company/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve seen it before, and we&#8217;ll see it again - Elliot Spitzer suing evil-doers.  Yes, Elliot is at it again, this time suing spyware vendor Intermix for infecting millions of computers with redirect code, silly toolbars that do nothing, and tons of popups.  Best guess is more than 3.7 installs in New York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>We&#8217;ve seen it before, and we&#8217;ll see it again - Elliot Spitzer suing evil-doers.  Yes, Elliot is at it again, this time <a title="Spitzer Sues Intermix Over 'Spyware' - Yahoo! News" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050428/ap_on_hi_te/spitzer_spyware%3b_ylt=A9FJqYk.IHFCkssAHges0NUE%3b_ylu=X3oDMTA2NDg4NWRqBHNlYwN0Yw--">suing spyware vendor Intermix</a> for infecting millions of computers with redirect code, silly toolbars that do nothing, and tons of popups.  Best guess is more than 3.7 installs in New York alone.</p>
<p>Boy I sure do wish I didn&#8217;t spend all of my time on my <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=rWSLPQplAy0&#038;offerid=77305.10000533&#038;type=3&#038;subid=0" >PowerBook</a><IMG border=0 width=1 height=1 src="http://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=rWSLPQplAy0&#038;bids=77305.10000533&#038;type=3&#038;subid=0" > and my Linux slab, or I too could see some of these neat little tricks.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, lets just hope Elliot has consumers best interests in mind, and has thought through <a title="Spamroll: Mommy, Elliot won't share" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/04/19/mommy-elliot-wont-share/">all the issues</a> before pulling the trigger on this one.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/spitzer-sues-spyware-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
