<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Harvard Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/harvard-law-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Harvard Law Review paper chimes in on net security</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/26/harvard-law-review-paper-chimes-in-on-net-security/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/26/harvard-law-review-paper-chimes-in-on-net-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/harvard-law-review-paper-chimes-in-on-net-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could have put up a sensationalist title like &#8220;Harvard says Go Hackers!&#8221; but that would have done nothing except ensure the post wound up on the front page of Digg, and I don&#8217;t yet understand what all those little votes mean anyway.  A student writing for Harvard Law Review thinks that outing vulnerabilities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I could have put up a sensationalist title like &#8220;Harvard says Go Hackers!&#8221; but that would have done nothing except ensure the post wound up on the front page of <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a>, and I don&#8217;t yet understand what all those little votes mean anyway.  A student writing for Harvard Law Review thinks that <a title="Slashdot | Immunizing the Internet" href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/26/0332239&#038;from=rss" target="">outing vulnerabilities keeps software makers on their toes</a>, so it should be a good thing.</p>
<p>Free markets at work, so to speak.  No further comment, as I am biased in that arena (i.e. I tend to agree).</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/26/harvard-law-review-paper-chimes-in-on-net-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
