<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; harvesting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/harvesting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>FTC makes breakthrough discoveries!</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/28/ftc-makes-breakthrough-discoveries/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/28/ftc-makes-breakthrough-discoveries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 03:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[harvesting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam filters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/ftc-makes-breakthrough-discoveries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission just completed a spam research study which indicated that spam filters work.  I&#8217;d say wow, but they go on to state the even more obvious.  The FTC says spammers actually harvest email addresses from public websites.  We never would have guessed.

The other good news is the FTC did [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The Federal Trade Commission just completed a spam research study which <a title="FTC Study Shows Technology Gaining in the Battle Against Spam" href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/11/spam3.htm">indicated that spam filters work</a>.  I&#8217;d say wow, but they go on to state the even more obvious.  The FTC says spammers actually harvest email addresses from public websites.  We never would have guessed.<br />
<span id="more-857"></span><br />
The other good news is the FTC did discover that two ISPs tested blocked between 85% and 95% of spam.  The other bad news is I don&#8217;t think the FTC can actively endorse the ISPs they tested, so I doubt we will ever find out who they are.  If someone does know, please clue the rest of us in.</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Brian McWilliams <a title="Spam Kings Blog: FTC fudges spam filter study" href="http://spamkings.oreilly.com/archives/2005/11/ftc_fudges_spam_filter_study.html">sheds more light on the FTC&#8217;s &#8220;study&#8221;</a>.  Maybe we don&#8217;t want to know who those ISPs are, or maybe we just shouldn&#8217;t care.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/28/ftc-makes-breakthrough-discoveries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
