<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Homeland Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/homeland-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Homeland Security loved that consumer data</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/homeland-security-loved-that-consumer-data/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/homeland-security-loved-that-consumer-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumer data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Secure Flight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/homeland-security-loved-that-consumer-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They probably hate it now, since they&#8217;ve just admitted they mixed consumer data with airline passenger info while working on the Secure Flight initiative.
The process is now considered a serious privacy issue, after DHS culled info from consumer databases provided by Acxiom, Insight America and Qsent.  Beyond that fact, auditors found security problems with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>They probably hate it now, since they&#8217;ve just admitted they <a title="Homeland Security Admits Privacy Errors in Anti-Terror Effort" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2077595,00.asp">mixed consumer data with airline passenger info</a> while working on the Secure Flight initiative.</p>
<p>The process is now considered a serious privacy issue, after DHS culled info from consumer databases provided by Acxiom, Insight America and Qsent.  Beyond that fact, auditors found security problems with the software that was being used.</p>
<p>DHS is blaming the mess on &#8220;inadvertent oversight.&#8221;  If the weak systems get hacked, it&#8217;ll be another one of <a title="Spamroll: US Government's newest spokesword...'anomalies'" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/07/12/us-governments-newest-spokeswordanomalies/">those &#8220;anomalies&#8221;</a>, so you can be pretty certain your data is still safe.</p>
<p>UPDATE: More on the Secure Flight issue <a title="Schneier on Security: Secure Flight Privacy Report" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/01/secure_flight_p_1.html">from Bruce Schneier</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/homeland-security-loved-that-consumer-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why bankers are bored with Homeland Security</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/09/why-bankers-are-bored-with-homeland-security/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/09/why-bankers-are-bored-with-homeland-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/why-bankers-are-bored-with-homeland-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homeland Security issued a terrorist warning to the financial services sector, and the bankers yawned.  No wonder - DHS&#8217;s information security is pretty paltry in it&#8217;s own right.
Then again, we already knew that.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Homeland Security issued a terrorist warning to the financial services sector, and the <a title="Spamroll: Feds warn of financial terrorism - bankers yawn" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/12/01/feds-warn-of-financial-terrorism-bankers-yawn/">bankers yawned</a>.  No wonder - DHS&#8217;s information security is <a href="http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&#038;status=article&#038;id=250471683355995&#038;view=1">pretty paltry</a> in it&#8217;s own right.</p>
<p>Then again, we <a title="Spamroll: Homeland Security gets an "F" on cybersecurity" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/16/homeland-security-gets-an-f-on-cybersecurity/">already knew that</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/09/why-bankers-are-bored-with-homeland-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security gets their Chief</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/09/21/homeland-security-gets-their-chief/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/09/21/homeland-security-gets-their-chief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/homeland-security-gets-their-chief/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homeland Security has been searching far and wide for a chief of cybersecurity.  Yes, while virtually every US Government department is getting piss poor grades for computer security (including Homeland Security), the bureacrats have been sitting on the fence (then again, what&#8217;s new there).
Now they&#8217;ve found their man.  It&#8217;s Greg Garcia, former VP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Homeland Security has been searching far and wide for a chief of cybersecurity.  Yes, while virtually every US Government department is <a title="Spamroll: Homeland Security gets an "F" on cybersecurity" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/16/homeland-security-gets-an-f-on-cybersecurity/" target="">getting piss poor grades for computer security</a> (including Homeland Security), the bureacrats have been sitting on the fence (then again, what&#8217;s new there).</p>
<p>Now <a title="Top Cyber-Security Post Is Filled - washingtonpost.com" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/18/AR2006091800928.html?nav=rss_business" target="">they&#8217;ve found their man</a>.  It&#8217;s Greg Garcia, former VP of the Information Technology Association of America.</p>
<p>Now, what&#8217;s their grade in human resources acquisition?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/09/21/homeland-security-gets-their-chief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security says close your Windows</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/08/10/homeland-security-says-close-your-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/08/10/homeland-security-says-close-your-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/homeland-security-says-close-your-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security announced that you should patch your Windows systems right away.
Yes, the folks that fail miserably on their own cybersecurity are telling everyone else to get on the ball.
So, when you see that little &#8220;Updates&#8221; popup in the lower right hand corner of your screen (you know, the one that appears [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img alt="windowsthreat.gif" src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/windowsthreat.gif" width="224" height="83" align="right" hspace="3" vspace="3" border="0" />The Department of Homeland Security <a title="DHS | Department of Homeland Security | DHS Recommends Security Patch to Protect Against a Vulnerability Found In Windows Operating Systems" href="http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=5789" target="">announced</a> that you should patch your Windows systems right away.</p>
<p>Yes, the folks that <a title="Spamroll: Homeland Security gets an "F" on cybersecurity" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/16/homeland-security-gets-an-f-on-cybersecurity/" target="">fail miserably on their own cybersecurity</a> are telling everyone else to get on the ball.</p>
<p>So, when you see that little &#8220;Updates&#8221; popup in the lower right hand corner of your screen (you know, the one that appears each and every time Microsoft issues patches), pay attention this time - a wise and wary group of governmental types say so.</p>
<p>Boy am I glad I read the news the morning, even if I am on a Mac.</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>A suggestion: If the government will pass a law stating that if an employee of an organization (including <a title="Spamroll: DOT needs lesson in laptop transportation" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/08/10/dot-needs-lesson-in-laptop-transportation/" target="">bureacracies</a>) leaves a laptop in a parked car (or unattended in any other public place for that matter), and it gets stolen, the employee must be terminated immediately.  In return, all citizens will then listen to government warnings about computer security threats.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/08/10/homeland-security-says-close-your-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The reality of national cybersecurity oversight</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/13/the-reality-of-national-cybersecurity-oversight/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/13/the-reality-of-national-cybersecurity-oversight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/the-reality-of-national-cybersecurity-oversight/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are highly proficient with telecommunications and information technology, there is a job opening for you.  Yes, the Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s Cybersecurity Czar post is still vacant, a year after the position was created.
Anyone with the talent to truly make a difference is almost certainly very busy nowadays, and would likely consider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>If you are highly proficient with telecommunications and information technology, <a title="A Year Later, Cybersecurity Post Still Vacant" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/12/AR2006071201894.html?nav=rss_politics" target="">there is a job opening for you</a>.  Yes, the Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s Cybersecurity Czar post is still vacant, a year after the position was created.</p>
<p>Anyone with the talent to truly make a difference is almost certainly very busy nowadays, and would likely consider the position a demotion.  Hence, I am not holding my breath as to its getting filled by someone competent and/or motivated to do the job, anytime soon.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/13/the-reality-of-national-cybersecurity-oversight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security chimes in on rootkits</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/21/homeland-security-chimes-in-on-rootkits/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/21/homeland-security-chimes-in-on-rootkits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rootkit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/homeland-security-chimes-in-on-rootkits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security thinks new laws against rootkits may be in order after the recent flurry of discoveries of their use (led by Sony BMG).
Like I said, I am getting more spam than ever (despite CAN-SPAM), so I have to withhold all comment, as the result is likely beyond my imagination.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The Department of Homeland Security <a title="US Department of Home Security Favors Laws Against Rootkits" href="http://www.gameshout.com/news/022006/article3288.htm">thinks new laws against rootkits</a> may be in order after the recent flurry of discoveries of their use (<a title="Spamroll: I only suspected it "could" happen" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/11/05/i-only-suspected-it-could-happen/">led by Sony BMG</a>).</p>
<p>Like I said, I am <a title="Spamroll: Zealots drive the anti-spyware community" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/01/30/zealots-drive-the-anti-spyware-community/">getting more spam than ever</a> (despite CAN-SPAM), so I have to withhold all comment, as the result is likely beyond my imagination.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/21/homeland-security-chimes-in-on-rootkits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting existing threats - stating existing solutions</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/16/predicting-existing-threats-stating-existing-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/16/predicting-existing-threats-stating-existing-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anti-spyware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brokerage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[threats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/predicting-existing-threats-stating-existing-solutions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the latest &#8220;predictions&#8221; regarding online threats by the fine and fair Department of Homeland Security are just their way of saying &#8220;We&#8217;re paying attention, and some legislator has a bill in waiting to pump up his/her profile prior to elections.&#8221;
Tops on the list of &#8220;predictions&#8221;&#8230;.spear phishing (already happening), and brokerage account break-ins (don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I think the latest <a title="EETimes.com - Homeland Security spells out coming online threats" href="http://www.eet.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180202421" target="">&#8220;predictions&#8221; regarding online threats</a> by the fine and fair Department of Homeland Security are just their way of saying &#8220;We&#8217;re paying attention, and some legislator has a bill in waiting to pump up his/her profile prior to elections.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tops on the list of &#8220;predictions&#8221;&#8230;.spear phishing (<a title="Spamroll: "Spear fishing," or targeted phishing" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/05/09/spear-fishing-or-targeted-phishing/">already happening</a>), and brokerage account break-ins (don&#8217;t worry here, the brokerages are already pretty good at <a title="Spamroll: AmEx Financial Accounts Stolen..." href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/01/26/amex-financial-accounts-stolen/">losing the data themselves</a>).</p>
<p>The safety recommendations include the ultra-creative &#8220;turn on your firewall,&#8221; &#8220;install and update anti-virus and anti-spyware,&#8221; and &#8220;perform regular operating system updates.&#8221;</p>
<p>The insight, the forethought!</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/16/predicting-existing-threats-stating-existing-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security not looking inside</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/13/homeland-security-not-looking-inside/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/13/homeland-security-not-looking-inside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/homeland-security-not-looking-inside/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since 9-11, everyone has been clamoring for business with the US Government.  Business is booming in and around Washington, and everyone who wants to bid on work must run through the venerable General Services Administration.  Unfortunately, that organization is running a system woefully lacking in security.
It isn&#8217;t the first time the government [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Ever since 9-11, everyone has been clamoring for business with the US Government.  Business is booming in and around Washington, and everyone who wants to bid on work must run through the venerable General Services Administration.  Unfortunately, that organization is <a title="Techdirt:Time To Bid On GSA Contract For Better Bidding Security" href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060113/0143259_F.shtml" target="">running a system woefully lacking in security</a>.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t the first time the government hasn&#8217;t paid attention to their own shop.  A spammer is now going to jail <a title="Techdirt:Another Spammer Expected To Get Jailtime" href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060112/1045243_F.shtml" target="">after bouncing his mail off government servers</a>, and that is just news from the last week.</p>
<p>The government needs to wake up and smell the coffee.  While they clamor to peek into Americans&#8217; private lives, driven by groupthink paranoia, they are sitting on holes in their own systems big enough to drive trucks through.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/13/homeland-security-not-looking-inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open source getting the security hit from both ends</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/11/open-source-getting-the-security-hit-from-both-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/11/open-source-getting-the-security-hit-from-both-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coverity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/open-source-getting-the-security-hit-from-both-ends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I say &#8220;hit&#8221; I don&#8217;t mean getting hammered either.
Novell just announced that they are going to be releasing their AppArmor intrusion prevention software under the GPL.  The product will likely get some improvements from the OS community, albeit at the expense of Homeland Security adding many line items on the Linux side of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>When I say &#8220;hit&#8221; I don&#8217;t mean getting hammered either.</p>
<p>Novell just announced that they are going to be <a title="Novell Open-Sources Major Linux Security Program" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1909552,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">releasing their AppArmor intrusion prevention software under the GPL</a>.  The product will likely get some improvements from the OS community, albeit at the expense of Homeland Security adding many line items on the Linux side of their <a title="Spamroll: US-CERT needs to learn how to count" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/01/05/us-cert-needs-to-learn-how-to-count/">less than accurately represented vulnerabilities list</a>.</p>
<p>You gotta wonder, however, if the whole US-CERT list thing was a public relations move, as Homeland Security just <a title="Homeland Security helps secure open-source code | CNET News.com" href="http://news.com.com/Homeland Security helps secure open-source code/2100-1002_3-6025579.html" target="">made a grant to three groups to improve open source security</a>.  Yep.  Over a million bucks is going to Stanford University, Coverity, and Symantec to work on OS bugs.  The Stanford/Coverity bit makes total sense to me - <a href="http://www.coverity.com/">Coverity</a> has a service that allows you to upload your C/C++ code to their system, at which time they scrub the heck out it looking for unnecessary complexity and the potential pitfalls that go along with that.  The technology, by the way, came out of Stanford.  I guess Symantec is just along for the ride.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/11/open-source-getting-the-security-hit-from-both-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A message from Homeland Security</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/25/a-message-from-homeland-security/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/25/a-message-from-homeland-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trojan horse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/a-message-from-homeland-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might of actually recommended this list of security precautions, especially considering the target.  A lot of folks have just unwrapped their fancy new machines, and now that the kids are all in bed, are probably going to plug them in to the net.  They will be quickly infected with some virus or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I might of actually recommended <a title="Joplin Independent:Novice computer users warned about threats" href="http://www.joplinindependent.com/display_article.php/terri-d1135458174" target="">this list of security precautions</a>, especially considering the target.  A lot of folks have just unwrapped their fancy new machines, and now that the kids are all in bed, are probably going to plug them in to the net.  They will be quickly infected with some virus or spyware, and that&#8217;s all she wrote.</p>
<p>In comes the Department of Homeland Security making suggestions about how to stay safe  - but their opening blows the credibility out of the water.  Instead of saying trojan horse software <cite>&#8220;was first discovered in May 2005,&#8221;</cite> they could have stated <cite>&#8220;the Department of Homeland Security first discovered the trojan horse threat in May 2005, even though every computer security company on the planet was isolating plenty of them by the late-90&#8217;s.&#8221;</cite></p>
<p>At least someone might have listened if they were honest.  Now a bunch of folks are going to get screwed (with the exception of those who got a boxed Linux distro in their stockings, or were lucky enough to have a loved one who braved the lines at the Apple Store).</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/25/a-message-from-homeland-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
