<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; IE7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/ie7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Six security patches, and IE7 or else</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/11/15/six-security-patches-and-ie7-or-else/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/11/15/six-security-patches-and-ie7-or-else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/six-security-patches-and-ie7-or-else/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft released six security patches yesterday (it was Tuesday, for god&#8217;s sake - what did you suspect?).
Along with those patches, IE7 will be automatically rolled out.  I hear IE7 is a bit tighter (although it still comes in behind Firefox on the anti-phishing front).  Still, I wonder how the auto-update will effect everyone.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Microsoft <a title="NewsFactor Network" href="http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=0320013PT6M8">released six security patches</a> yesterday (it was Tuesday, for god&#8217;s sake - what did you suspect?).</p>
<p>Along with those patches, IE7 will be automatically rolled out.  I hear IE7 is a bit tighter (although it still comes in behind Firefox on <a title="Spamroll: PhishFight I: Firefox 1, IE7 0" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/11/15/phishfight-i-firefox-1-ie7-0/">the anti-phishing front</a>).  Still, I wonder how the auto-update will effect everyone.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/11/15/six-security-patches-and-ie7-or-else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest bug for IE7 probably a big mistake</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/10/27/latest-bug-for-ie7-probably-a-big-mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/10/27/latest-bug-for-ie7-probably-a-big-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/latest-bug-for-ie7-probably-a-big-mistake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Secunia has found a bug in Internet Explorer 7, one that allows address bar spoofing that could lead to phishing exploits.
This must be a big mistake, as there is no way Microsoft can blame some other software for the issue.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Secunia has found a bug in Internet Explorer 7, one that <a title="IE7 spoofing bug pops up | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/26/ie7_spoofing_bug/">allows address bar spoofing</a> that could lead to phishing exploits.</p>
<p>This must be a big mistake, as there is no way <a title="Spamroll: Microsoft going into politics" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-going-into-politics/">Microsoft can blame some other software</a> for the issue.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/10/27/latest-bug-for-ie7-probably-a-big-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft going into politics</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-going-into-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-going-into-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Outlook Express]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/microsoft-going-into-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 7 came out, and security experts were quick to jump on it.  Flaws were immediately found, and now Microsoft is backpedalling like a bunch of politicians.
&#8220;These reports are technically inaccurate: the issue concerned in these reports is not in Internet Explorer 7 (or any other version) at all. Rather, it is in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Internet Explorer 7 came out, and security experts were quick to jump on it.  Flaws <a title="Attacks, Flaw Reports Mar IE 7 Release - Security Fix" href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/10/attacks_flaw_reports_tarnish_i.html">were immediately found</a>, and now Microsoft is backpedalling like a bunch of politicians.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;These reports are technically inaccurate: the issue concerned in these reports is not in Internet Explorer 7 (or any other version) at all. Rather, it is in a different Windows component, specifically a component in Outlook Express. While these reports use Internet Explorer as a vector the vulnerability itself is in Outlook Express.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The company must obviously be doing their IE development on Linux, where Outlook Express is nowhere to be found.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/10/22/microsoft-going-into-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
