<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Is Google&#8217;s Proprietary Tech Stack Destroying Its Acquisitions?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/23/is-googles-proprietary-tech-stack-destroying-its-acquisitions/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/23/is-googles-proprietary-tech-stack-destroying-its-acquisitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=2356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Masnick makes great points in this regard, the best of which is (emphasis mine):
So, for startups whose strategy is to get acquired by Google (and, I should note, if you start with that strategy, you&#8217;re probably going to fail)&#8230;
I have no opinion on the specific matter.  But, just the other day a colleague [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Mike Masnick <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080717/2255221720.shtml">makes great points</a> in this regard, the best of which is (emphasis mine):</p>
<blockquote><p>So, for startups whose strategy is to get acquired by Google (and, I should note, <strong>if you start with that strategy, you&#8217;re probably going to fail</strong>)&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no opinion on the specific matter.  But, just the other day a colleague and I discussed the fact that since Google has such an enormous (and ongoing) investment in proprietary computing infrastructure, they might be vulnerable to &#8220;evolutionary jumps&#8221; in computing technology some time in the future.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/23/is-googles-proprietary-tech-stack-destroying-its-acquisitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
