<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; IPv6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/ipv6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The last day of the year - time for 2007 predictions</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/31/the-last-day-of-the-year-time-for-2007-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/31/the-last-day-of-the-year-time-for-2007-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumer data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security threats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/the-last-day-of-the-year-time-for-2007-predictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is the last day of 2006.  What better time for predictions&#8230;
From the experts:

The security threats that will bind us in 2007
If you are more inclined to make (or lose) money next year, here&#8217;s &#8220;the take&#8221; from the Washington Post
Spamroll says:

Spam will not end in late January (and Bill Gates will remain mum thereafter)
Some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>It is the last day of 2006.  What better time for predictions&#8230;</p>
<p>From the experts:</p>
<ul>
<li>The security threats that will bind us <a title="E-Commerce News: Viruses &amp; Malware: Predicting the Top Security Threats for 2007" href="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/WmzkMhzZEWEiXO/Predicting-the-Top-Security-Threats-for-2007.xhtml">in 2007</a></p>
<li>If you are more inclined to make (or lose) money next year, here&#8217;s &#8220;the take&#8221; <a title="Cybercrooks Deliver Trouble - washingtonpost.com" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/26/AR2006122600922.html">from the Washington Post</a></ul>
<p>Spamroll says:</p>
<ul>
<li>Spam <a title="Spamroll: In about a month, this site is through" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/12/20/in-about-a-month-this-site-is-through/">will not end</a> in late January (and Bill Gates will remain mum thereafter)</p>
<li>Some spyware companies will be <a title="Spamroll: Spyware purveyor sued in class action" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/04/10/spyware-purveyor-sued-in-class-action/">getting sued</a> again by February, while the rest change their company name
<li>The government will quit <a title="Spamroll: Homeland Security loved that consumer data" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/homeland-security-loved-that-consumer-data/">buying consumer data</a> in March, after determining that who is buying TMX Elmo is in no way correlated with who has a tendency to be a terrorist
<li>Everyone will be <a title="Spamroll: No backup plan is ransomware in its own right" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/11/24/no-backup-plan-is-ransomware-in-its-own-right/">backing up their hard drives</a> by April, but only if external hard drives are free
<li>They&#8217;ll be <a title="Spamroll: Nothing beats a good padlock" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/05/03/nothing-beats-a-good-padlock/">encrypting them</a> by May, because everyone will be running <a title="Spamroll: Love doesn't last forever, but Vista activation might" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/12/26/love-doesnt-last-forever-but-vista-activation-might/">hacked versions of Vista</a>
<li>We&#8217;ll all take the summer off, since <a title=" Symantec Security Response Weblog: Phishers Take Summers and Weekends Off, Too " href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2006/12/phishers_take_summers_and_week.html">phishers already do</a>
<li>Back-to-school will piss off millions of children, and not much else
<li>October will be much like September
<li>Telcos will <a title="Spamroll: IPv6 in the house was no big deal" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/">implement IPv6</a> for Thanksgiving, and everyone on the internet will know who everyone else is, once and for all (with the exception of MacBook Pro users, which are already being tracked <a title="Wired News: Computer Warming a Privacy Risk" href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72375-0.html">via heatsink</a>)
<li>We&#8217;ll get a ton of self-serving predictions for 2008, a week early at Christmas</ul>
<p>Happy New Year!</p>
<p>UPDATE: Sarcasm does work - someone is <a title="Fewer Excuses for Not Doing a PC Backup - New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/04/technology/04pogue.html">thinking about backup</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/31/the-last-day-of-the-year-time-for-2007-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Government sets IPv6 transition timeline</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/23/us-government-sets-ipv6-transition-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/23/us-government-sets-ipv6-transition-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the transition will happen sometime in 2008, roughly two years ahead of the Microsoft Windows Vista revised release date.
Of course, the transition to IPv6 is already happening over here.  Sounds like Google doesn&#8217;t want to wait either.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Looks like the transition <a title="Latest chapters give guidance but some question its level of detail" href="http://www.gcn.com/print/25_16/41051-1.html">will happen sometime in 2008</a>, roughly two years ahead of the Microsoft Windows Vista revised release date.</p>
<p>Of course, the transition to IPv6 is <a title="Thought Market: IPv6 in the house was no big deal" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/">already happening over here</a>.  Sounds like <a title="Google and Its Continuing Dark Fiber Mystery" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1980605,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594">Google doesn&#8217;t want to wait</a> either.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/23/us-government-sets-ipv6-transition-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Security crash brings bigger debate</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/19/blue-security-crash-brings-bigger-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/19/blue-security-crash-brings-bigger-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blue Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/blue-security-crash-brings-bigger-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blue Security fiasco took down SixApart, but it seems the trouble didn&#8217;t end there.  Multitudes of related operations went haywire, begging the question - is the internet really that fragile? 
Slashdot readers debate the issue.  I wonder if embracing IPv6 would solve a lot of these problems.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The Blue Security fiasco <a title="Spamroll: Anyone have a blue casket?" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/05/04/anyone-have-a-blue-casket/" target="">took down SixApart</a>, but it seems the trouble didn&#8217;t end there.  Multitudes of related operations <a title="Security Fix - Brian Krebs on Computer and Internet Security - (washingtonpost.com)" href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/05/blue_security_surrenders_but_s.html" target="">went haywire</a>, begging the question - is the internet really that fragile? </p>
<p>Slashdot readers <a title="Slashdot | BlueSecurity Fall-Out Reveals Larger Problem" href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/18/2158227&#038;from=rss" target="">debate the issue</a>.  I wonder if embracing IPv6 would solve a lot of these problems.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/19/blue-security-crash-brings-bigger-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Releasing hacking tools early ain&#8217;t so bad</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/09/releasing-hacking-tools-early-aint-so-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/09/releasing-hacking-tools-early-aint-so-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/releasing-hacking-tools-early-aint-so-bad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hacker&#8217;s tools can be used for no good, but a lot of folks use them to test vulnerabilities, so early release can be a very good thing.  Meanwhile, IPv6 is hardly popular in the US, despite how easy it is to get going, because service/content/network providers in the States just haven&#8217;t embraced it (mostly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Hacker&#8217;s tools can be used for no good, but a lot of folks use them to test vulnerabilities, so early release can be a very good thing.  Meanwhile, IPv6 is hardly popular in the US, despite <a title="Thought Market: IPv6 in the house was no big deal" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/" target="">how easy it is to get going</a>, because service/content/network providers in the States just haven&#8217;t embraced it (mostly citing cost issues).  But when they do, they&#8217;ll have <a title="THC-IPV6 - attacking the IPV6 protocol suite" href="http://thc.org/thc-ipv6/" target="">hacking tools</a> to help them out.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/09/releasing-hacking-tools-early-aint-so-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone is finally targeting IPv6</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/10/someone-is-finally-targeting-ipv6/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/10/someone-is-finally-targeting-ipv6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the US, no less.  A new firm Command Information, is promising a better internet by pushing the IPv6 standard.  I can&#8217;t help but say its about time.
Getting up to snuff in this arena will bring the need for new hardware and software, and new human resources to bear.  Many will say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>In the US, no less.  A new firm Command Information, is <a title="RED HERRING | IPv6 Firm Promises Better Net" href="http://www.redherring.com/article.aspx?a=16036">promising a better internet</a> by pushing the IPv6 standard.  I can&#8217;t help but say its about time.</p>
<p>Getting up to snuff in this arena will bring the need for new hardware and software, and new human resources to bear.  Many will say that the IP address they have now is good enough - &#8220;what do I need that for?&#8221;  And I&#8217;ll say that is exactly the kind of thinking that will keep the US <a title="Thought Market: Losing tech competitiveness in more ways than one" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/12/13/losing-tech-competitiveness-in-more-ways-than-one/">on a tech competitiveness losing streak</a>.  And for those that don&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s happening, just ask the software engineer who just lost out on a project to someone overseas.  If you want to be at the forefront of technological advancement, you have to have the right tools.  And the new IP addressing standard is one of them.</p>
<p>I might also say <a title="Thought Market: IPv6 in the house was no big deal" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/">go do it yourself</a>, but that would be a bit harsh, and more than a bit presumptuous.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/10/someone-is-finally-targeting-ipv6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPv6 in the house was no big deal</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been following the IPv6 thing for a while now, mostly wondering why it is second nature for non-US ISPs, and why the US just can&#8217;t seem to get its act together on it.
So a few days ago I took it upon myself to determine just how far out of reach IPv6 was for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img alt="ipv6.jpg" src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/ipv6.jpg" align="left" border="0" vspace="3" hspace="3" width="111" height="81" />I have been following the IPv6 thing for a while now, mostly wondering why it is second nature for non-US ISPs, and why the US <a title="Thought Market: Losing tech competitiveness in more ways than one" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/12/13/losing-tech-competitiveness-in-more-ways-than-one/">just can&#8217;t seem to get its act together</a> on it.</p>
<p>So a few days ago I took it upon myself to determine just how far out of reach IPv6 was for the average finance geek turned tech explorer.</p>
<p>What did I find?  Cake..nothing but cake.<br />
<span id="more-245"></span><br />
What follows is a &#8220;base map&#8221; that any remotely tech savvy person can use to get IPv6 service over a broadband connection.  And when I say tech savvy, I mean if you can visit a few websites, follow a few directions, plug in an ethernet cable, and don&#8217;t mind blowing $60 on a router, you can be on IPv6 in just a few hours time.</p>
<p>First stop, <a title="Hurricane Electric IPv6 Tunnel Broker" href="http://tunnelbroker.net/index.php" target="">Hurricane Electric</a>, an IPv6 tunnel broker.  Register - it costs you nothing.  Give them your connection&#8217;s regular IP address, and within a day or two (assuming they can ping your router - make sure you let it accept pings), you are approved.  You then set your nameservers as blank, and you get an IPv6 address block.</p>
<p>Next step, get a new router that is IPv6 capable.  Here is where the $60 and a few tricks come in.  I found that the Linksys WRT54G was hackable as all getup, as long as you had a version lower than v5.  I picked one up at CompUSA, and with rebates, set me back $45.  Then hit <a href="http://wrt-wiki.bsr-clan.de/index.php?title=DD-WRT_Docu_%28EN%29" target="">BrainSlayer&#8217;s DD-WRT Wiki</a>, where you can find all the information you need to turn that Linksys router into a powerhouse.  Follow the directions there closely, particularly if you have a version 4 router like I did (more on that later).</p>
<p>Once you have the new firmware installed, visit <a title="www.solosoft.org - Your Online Resource to Nothing" href="http://solosoft.org:81/projects/ipv6/">Chris Sologuk&#8217;s Solosoft.org</a> - Chris provides all the instructions and scripts you need to light up that router&#8217;s IPv6 capability.  And for those of you unlucky enough to have version 4 of those Linksys routers, don&#8217;t fret when you can&#8217;t get those scripts to work.  Chris was kind enough to email me a proposed workaround that I am including below, with as little editing as possible so the contributor (whoever Jimmy is) gets credit where credit is due:</p>
<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve tested this enough, after unplugging the router and<br />
rebooting the router a few times it still retained the settings&#8230;<br />
here&#8217;s a brief outline of what i did using your guide as the initial<br />
basis&#8230; i&#8217;d like to have used jffs as well but since space is at a<br />
premium here goes&#8230;</p>
<p>(im running the dd-wrt standard image on the wrt54gsv4 device)</p>
<p>1. sign up to HE for a tunnel<br />
2. got your sample radvd.conf and ip.sh scripts&#8230;<br />
    2a) i modified radvd.conf to suit my subnet&#8230;</p>
<p>        interface br0<br />
        { AdvSendAdvert on;<br />
        MinRtrAdvInterval 3;<br />
        MaxRtrAdvInterval 10;<br />
        AdvHomeAgentFlag off;<br />
        prefix 2001:470:xxxx:xxxx::/64<br />
        { AdvOnLink on;<br />
        AdvAutonomous on;<br />
        AdvRouterAddr on;<br />
        };};</p>
<p>    2b) i got the ip.sh file and ripped out all the comments and<br />
variable substitutions&#8230;. and was left with this&#8230;.</p>
<p>        /usr/sbin/ip tunnel add sixbone mode sit local xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx<br />
remote 64.xxx.xxx.xxx<br />
        /usr/sbin/ip link set sixbone up<br />
        /usr/sbin/ip link set mtu 1280 dev sixbone<br />
        /usr/sbin/ip tunnel change sixbone ttl 64<br />
        /usr/sbin/ip -6 addr add 2001:470:xxxx:xxxx::xxxx/127 dev sixbone<br />
        /usr/sbin/ip -6 ro add default via 2001:470:xxxx:xxxx::112E dev<br />
sixbone<br />
        /usr/sbin/ip -6 addr add 2001:470:1F00:xxxx::/64 dev br0</p>
<p>3. go to the web interface of the linksys router&#8230;<br />
       3a) go to administration -> management, then enable ipv6 and radvd<br />
       3b) paste the above radvd config to the config box in the web<br />
interface</p>
<p>4. go to the webinterface of the linksys router&#8230;<br />
        4a) go to administration -> services, then enable sshd, enable<br />
password login if not using ssh keys</p>
<p>5.  (here&#8217;s the neat thing that i found after reading the dd-wrt<br />
wiki&#8230;) it involves using the rc_startup variable in the nvram to store<br />
the iproute commands to setup the tunnel itself. this can be done either<br />
via the web interface or the console. I&#8217;ll just show you what/where i<br />
went to set this up&#8230;.<br />
       5a) go to the web interface of the linksys router&#8230;<br />
administration -> diagnostics<br />
       5b) click on the &#8220;run&#8221; button<br />
       5c) a new window will have popped up allowing one to enter in<br />
commands to run on the router, its just a fancy interface to the console.<br />
       5d) enter in the above iproute commands and then click on &#8220;save<br />
startup&#8221;.<br />
       5e) to verify or do this from the command line, ssh into the<br />
router, then do</p>
<p>             =======sample=======<br />
            ~ # nvram show | grep rc_start<br />
            size: 24279 bytes (8489 left)<br />
            rc_startup=/usr/sbin/ip tunnel add sixbone mode sit local<br />
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx remote 64.xxx.xxx.xxx<br />
             =======sample=======<br />
             (the above seems to be truncated but if you do nvram show |<br />
more and just scroll through the list you&#8217;ll see the whole set of commands)</p>
<p>             this is how one would set it up from the console, you can<br />
set the radvd config up with one of the nvram variables as well but its<br />
easier to use the web interface</p>
<p>             =======sample=======<br />
             ~ # nvram set rc_startup=&#8221;<br />
             /usr/sbin/ip tunnel add sixbone mode sit local<br />
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx remote 64.xxx.xxx.xxx<br />
             .<br />
             .<br />
             (press enter on a blank line to end the sequence of commands)<br />
              =======sample=======</p>
<p>the rc_startup variable is generally used to call a user defined script<br />
on startup, but since its just a shell variable and you&#8217;re just calling<br />
a script you can put a few commands in there&#8230; i seem to have only 10kb<br />
of  free nvram before doing this,  and after wards about 8kb left, thats<br />
why i stripped down the iproute commands as much as possible and used<br />
the inbuilt radvd config stuff (which is probably using up some nvram as<br />
well)</p>
<p>this method does appear to work for me since i couldnt get the samba<br />
stuff working properly as i dont always have a machine on and the method<br />
does require some thinking on the person setting up, but i think most<br />
people who are interested in this will probably know what they are at<br />
anyway&#8230;.</p>
<p>Jimmy.</p>
<p>Master Jimmy&#8217;s instructions worked first try for me.  And don&#8217;t be intimidated by all the technical stuff - it was easier than it looks at first glance.  For me, it was a sum total three hours work, including a trip to the store.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Tooling around with IPv6 may be fun to some, education to others (like me).  But it <a title="Schneier on Security: Internet Worms and IPv6" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/02/internet_worms.html" target="">isn&#8217;t going to make you any safer from web bugs</a>, so keep your firewall and anti-virus on on on.</p>
<p>***UPDATE 2***</p>
<p>On a lighter note, once you finish all this work, you can test your connection at <a href="http://www.kame.net" target="">www.kame.net</a>.  If you see the &#8220;dancing kame&#8221; then check the bottom left hand corner of the page.  You should see some stats that look like this:</p>
<p><img alt="ipv6viakamenet.gif" src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/ipv6viakamenet.gif" border="0" width="355" height="48" /></p>
<p>Again, good luck.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/06/ipv6-in-the-house-was-no-big-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Losing tech competitiveness in more ways than one</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/13/losing-tech-competitiveness-in-more-ways-than-one/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/13/losing-tech-competitiveness-in-more-ways-than-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows the story about Google sucking up all the brainpower in the Bay Area.  On the flip side of the coin, folks say you can do anything and work from anywhere in the internet age, so why work for Google?  That is true if you have the human resources and infrastructure to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Everyone knows the story about Google sucking up all the brainpower in the Bay Area.  On the flip side of the coin, folks say you can do anything and work from anywhere in the internet age, so why work for Google?  That is true if you have the human resources and infrastructure to beat the next guy to the punch, and two unfolding elements could throw that off.<br />
<span id="more-196"></span><br />
The first of those phenoms is a pretty obvious and well talked about one - the <a title="RED HERRING | India Outsourcing to Grow 10X" href="http://www.redherring.com/article.aspx?a=14850" target="">shifting of human resource allocations to India</a>.  It makes sense from an intermediate term cost perspective, and some <a title="Thought Market: It is not just in the tea leaves" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/12/11/it-is-not-just-in-the-tea-leaves/">big hitters are investing heavily</a> in the region right now.  But in the long-term, it pushes the desire for tech learning away, leaving the US less competitive as time passes.  If you thought your future was headed across the sea, you&#8217;d apply to law school too (although that profession may not be far from disappearing either).</p>
<p>The second take is the reluctance to move on to bigger and better infrastructure.  IPv6, the next step in internet protocols, is making slow progress in America.  Everyone is bitching about <a title="Could a U.S. Shift to IPv6 Cost $75B?" href="http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3570211" target="">the potentially enormous cost</a>, when both the range of estimates (very wide) and its cost relative to GDP (very small) remain out of focus.  Meanwhile European and Asian countries are pushing ahead fast.  Funny that those same regions are the ones everyone is seeing the jobs moving to.</p>
<p>Google seems to know what is going on.  They invest heavily in local resources, and they are already <a title="Output from ARIN WHOIS" href="http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET6-2001-4860-1" target="">prepping for IPv6</a>.  Will they be the only competitive tech company left standing in the US?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/13/losing-tech-competitiveness-in-more-ways-than-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
