<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Sophos says it&#8217;s time to switch computing platforms</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/05/sophos-says-its-time-to-switch-computing-platforms/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/05/sophos-says-its-time-to-switch-computing-platforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sophos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/sophos-says-its-time-to-switch-computing-platforms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sophos just released their latest Security Threat Management Report, and the news is not good for all.  Viruses are waning, but malicious malware designed to steal you blind (say financially-oriented trojans) is up dramatically.  The Sobers and Netskys of the world still lead the charge, but the face of deliver is simply changing.
Then, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Sophos <a title="Sophos Security Report reveals Trojan domination in first half of 2006" href="http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2006/07/securityreportmid2006.html" target="">just released</a> their latest Security Threat Management Report, and the news is not good for all.  Viruses are waning, but malicious malware designed to steal you blind (say financially-oriented trojans) is up dramatically.  The Sobers and Netskys of the world still lead the charge, but the face of deliver is simply changing.</p>
<p>Then, in the wake of this news, Sophos (who I feel generally maintains an unbiased reporting approach in order to preserve their credibility), adds the following footnotes to their distribution charts:</p>
<p>For malware&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>All of the above malware works on Windows; none is capable of infecting Mac OS X.</p></blockquote>
<p>and their families&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Again, all of the above malware works on Microsoft Windows; none is capable of infecting the Apple Macintosh operating system.</p></blockquote>
<p>They go on to say&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><cite>&#8220;It&#8217;s more vital than ever that all organisations use an integrated security solution to protect against intrusion, as well as blocking known and unknown malware. On top of this, hackers seem happy to primarily target Windows users and not spread their wings to other platforms. It seems likely that Macs will continue to be the safer place for computer users for some time to come - something that home users may wish to consider if they&#8217;re deliberating about the next computer they should purchase.&#8221;</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>This couldn&#8217;t be much more timely.  I was recently accused of being a well-crafted shill (for OS X, despite the fact I generally promote Linux side-by-side), and a &#8220;clueless machead.&#8221; Well, let&#8217;s just set the story straight.</p>
<p>I was a Windows user since the days of 3.1, moving to 95, then <a title="Spamroll: Windows 98 support dies, but vulnerabilities live" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/06/09/windows-98-support-dies-but-vulnerabilities-live/" target="">migrating carefully along the NT-based set</a>.  I never got an infection (I spent a hoard of money on protective mechanisms), but since I put my machines through their paces, I saw the &#8220;blue screen of death&#8221; on numerous occasions.  Then I <a title="Thought Market: A decent Linux laptop (continued)" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/01/22/a-decent-linux-laptop-continued/" target="">stuffed Linux on my Dell laptop</a>, and I was hooked.  My &#8220;in-the-know&#8221; friends lent a helping hand, while my less inclined colleagues continued to struggle with Windows.  I found freedom to do what I wanted with my desktop - but it took time.  The ensuing months found me spending more and more of my work day on the Linux side of that tricky little dual-boot, dual-drive Dell, even though that work day was primarily financial in nature.</p>
<p>Then one day, I get handed a Powerbook - told to toy with it on a rainy weekend.  I did, and what I found was the best of both worlds, so I bought one myself.  I&#8217;ve stuff a fresh database server on it, used it to test web apps, compiled Gimp and Ethereal for it, and hoards of other half-fun, half-needed things.  And I&#8217;ve even protected it with anti-virus software (mostly to prevent passing something on to others).  It has never crashed to memory dump or been infected, and I can (surprise) still use it to send email, build financial projections, and write letters.  And, Linux is still the platform of choice when bringing a server up.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but be biased now, but I&#8217;ve put in the hours.  I promote OS X because the shit works, and I hate seeing my friends struggle (and I hate reformatting their Windows machines, and reinstalling XP, too, although I do it anyway).  I&#8217;ve gotten numerous people to switch to Linux (and if it <a title="Spamroll: The future of computing privacy ends with an "X"" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/07/04/the-future-of-computing-privacy-ends-with-an-x/" target="">had training wheels, they would have probably stayed</a>).  Only one migration to OS X as a result of my preaching (due mostly to cost), but it has stuck.  Put in the time, or fork up the dough - both are fine by me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t own Microsoft or Apple or Red Hat stock either.</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Regardless of what&#8217;s really the case, a battle ensued over at Slashdot, and the <a title="Slashdot | Does Sophos' Switch Argument Hold Water?" href="http://backslash.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/1821235&#038;from=rss" target="">arguments were top notch</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/05/sophos-says-its-time-to-switch-computing-platforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of computing privacy ends with an &#8220;X&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/04/the-future-of-computing-privacy-ends-with-an-x/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/04/the-future-of-computing-privacy-ends-with-an-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 13:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[WGA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/the-future-of-computing-privacy-ends-with-an-x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the future is reserved for the minority.
In the wake of the Windows Genuine Advantage &#8220;issue,&#8221; Peter Cullen, Microsoft&#8217;s chief privacy strategist speaks out.  Slashdotters are throwing the bullshit flag over it, calling for companies to take the UNIX bull by the horns and screaming for more Linux on the desktop.
I&#8217;ve converted half a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>And the future is reserved for the minority.</p>
<p>In the wake of the <a title="Spamroll: Who needs little aliens when you have Windows" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/06/08/who-needs-little-aliens-when-you-have-windows/" target="">Windows Genuine Advantage &#8220;issue,&#8221;</a> Peter Cullen, Microsoft&#8217;s chief privacy strategist speaks out.  Slashdotters are <a title="Slashdot | Planning the Future of Privacy at Microsoft" href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/03/2358206&#038;from=rss" target="">throwing the bullshit flag over it</a>, calling for companies to take the UNIX bull by the horns and screaming for more Linux on the desktop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve converted half a dozen folks to Linux in the last year.  Unfortunately most of them have switched back.  Why?  Learning something new is just too much work for most people, even if it does mean less hassles from viruses, spyware, and their computers disclosing its contents to some &#8220;big brother.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Microsoft knows this.</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>A <a title="Seth's Blog: Training wheels" href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/07/training_wheels.html" target="">call for Linux &#8220;training wheels&#8221; has been made</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/04/the-future-of-computing-privacy-ends-with-an-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch your desktop OS popularity level</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/22/watch-your-desktop-os-popularity-level/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/22/watch-your-desktop-os-popularity-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/watch-your-desktop-os-popularity-level/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years of tried and true service in the backoffice and among the highly technical set, UNIX-like operating systems are tooting high tones on the mainstream desktop.  I am sure those historically &#8220;in the know,&#8221; having tackled Linux, OS X and other flavors for their computing needs, are feeling rather smug right now.
But wait! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>After years of tried and true service in the backoffice and among the highly technical set, UNIX-like operating systems are tooting high tones on the mainstream desktop.  I am sure those historically &#8220;in the know,&#8221; having tackled Linux, OS X and other flavors for their computing needs, are feeling rather smug right now.</p>
<p>But wait!  In the midst of &#8220;other&#8221; operating systems failure to deliver decent security (and maybe even fail to deliver to the store shelves in one piece), all of a sudden threats to the underdogs are being spoke of everywhere.</p>
<p>Does the newfound popularity make <a title=" Linux desktop growth could spur new malware activity - Computerworld" href="http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,110710,00.html" target="">Linux</a> and <a title="Mac OS X found to be vulnerable to virus attacks" href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/6271.html" target="">OS X</a> vulnerable to technical attacks, or simply the target of pundits&#8217; attacks?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/22/watch-your-desktop-os-popularity-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First double-handed virus reported</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/07/first-double-handed-virus-reported/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/07/first-double-handed-virus-reported/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/first-double-handed-virus-reported/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A proof of concept has been released for a virus that can affect both Windows and Linux machines.
As those systems are attached at the hip, with the majority of desktops running Windows and a slew of servers running Linux, this is not good news.

***UPDATE***
Word has it there isn&#8217;t much too this.
***UPDATE 2***
And Linus Torvalds creates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>A proof of concept has been released for a <a title=" Kaspersky warns of cross-platform virus proof of concept - Computerworld" href="http://computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/virus/story/0,10801,110330,00.html" target="">virus that can affect both Windows and Linux machines</a>.</p>
<p>As those systems are attached at the hip, with the majority of desktops running Windows and a slew of servers running Linux, this is not good news.<br />
<span id="more-1129"></span><br />
***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Word has it there <a title="Cross-platform virus poses little risk | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/11/cross_platform_malware/" target="">isn&#8217;t much too this</a>.</p>
<p>***UPDATE 2***</p>
<p>And Linus Torvalds <a title="Slashdot | Torvalds Creates Patch for Cross-Platform Virus" href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/18/2046203&#038;from=rss" target="">creates a patch</a>, at least for the Linux side of the threat.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/04/07/first-double-handed-virus-reported/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting evil need not be forever</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/28/fighting-evil-need-not-be-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/28/fighting-evil-need-not-be-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/fighting-evil-need-not-be-forever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Husted breaks down some needed tools you have to have to stay safe from evildoers lurking on our computer networks.  Firewall, anti-virus, anti-spyware, and you are set.  But for how long?
&#8220;Unfortunately, given the state of computer security, your term of enlistment is for life.
I disagree.  A lifetime&#8217;s enslavement is only for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Bill Husted <a title="Durango Herald Online" href="http://durangoherald.com/asp-bin/article_generation.asp?article_type=tech&#038;article_path=/technology/tech060326.htm" target="">breaks down some needed tools</a> you have to have to stay safe from evildoers lurking on our computer networks.  Firewall, anti-virus, anti-spyware, and you are set.  But for how long?</p>
<blockquote><p><cite>&#8220;Unfortunately, given the state of computer security, your term of enlistment is for life.</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>I disagree.  A lifetime&#8217;s enslavement is only for those who can&#8217;t stand change (or just aren&#8217;t willing to step out of their comfort zone for a bit).  You could prepare yourself for the future by studying the past.  Pick a new operating system - one that ends with an &#8220;X&#8221; instead of starting with it.  You might be <a title="Vista delay could sting PC makers | CNET News.com" href="http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-6052372.html" target="">waiting a long long time</a> for a less &#8220;invasive&#8221; solution.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/03/28/fighting-evil-need-not-be-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux now has all the money</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/14/linux-now-has-all-the-money/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/14/linux-now-has-all-the-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Swiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can sit around crying the glories of open source.  I can post repeatedly about its benefits, and its momentum.  You don&#8217;t have to listen.
And it may not matter anymore, as open source now controls ALL the money - or something like that.  The Swiss government is switching to Linux.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I can sit around crying the glories of open source.  I can post repeatedly about its benefits, and its momentum.  You don&#8217;t have to listen.</p>
<p>And it may not matter anymore, as open source now controls ALL the money - or something like that.  The Swiss government <a title="Swiss Government Switches 3,000 Systems to Linux" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1901495,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">is switching to Linux</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/14/linux-now-has-all-the-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, you are suckers</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/10/yes-you-are-suckers/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/10/yes-you-are-suckers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/yes-you-are-suckers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Steven Roemerman, precisely &#8220;81% of you are suckers,&#8221; and I am going to agree.  Fortunately, Steven is no blowhard (like me).  Instead of just smearing all of you, he has provided some simple, straightforward tips to keep your [Windows] machine safe from intruders.

Unfortunately, I look at the scenario a bit differently. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>According to Steven Roemerman, precisely &#8220;81% of you are suckers,&#8221; and I am going to agree.  Fortunately, Steven is no blowhard (like me).  Instead of just smearing all of you, he has provided <a title="Roemerman on Record: 81% of You Are Suckers!" href="http://roemerman.blogspot.com/2005/12/81-of-you-are-suckers.html">some simple, straightforward tips</a> to keep your [Windows] machine safe from intruders.<br />
<span id="more-879"></span><br />
Unfortunately, I look at the scenario a bit differently.  I think 81% of you are running Windows instead of some hardy flavor of Linux or OS X, and that is what makes you a sucker.  But that is just one [virus, adware, spyware, malware, pop-up, zombie, ping-barrage and relatively spam* and phish* free] person&#8217;s opinion.</p>
<p>*Garnered through a combination of Linux server-based SpamAssassin and a cute (but quite effective) Entourage spam filter, while sitting behind my WPA-equipped (hacked Netgear) router and OS X (stealth) firewalls.  The remote mini-cams out on the streets (for Wi-Fi thief surveillance), the 4096 bit encrypted satellite uplink on the roof (for secure instant messaging), and my witness protection program hotline number are of no major consequence.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/10/yes-you-are-suckers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paying attention to Linux needs</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/paying-attention-to-linux-needs/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/paying-attention-to-linux-needs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vexira]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/paying-attention-to-linux-needs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always been a little cautious with my Linux install, not because I don&#8217;t trust it, but because I don&#8217;t trust those on the outside who might decide to tool with it for less than honorable reasons.  So it is nice to see that someone is paying attention to Linux users.  While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I have always been a little cautious with my <a href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/01/22/a-decent-linux-laptop-continued/">Linux install</a>, not because I don&#8217;t trust it, but because I don&#8217;t trust those on the outside who might decide to tool with it for less than honorable reasons.  So it is nice to see that <a title="eServer Magazine | | News" href="http://www.eservercomputing.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&#038;nm=&#038;type=news&#038;mod=News&#038;mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&#038;tier=3&#038;nid=B8558A4A8AA044CFBCE999D747B01DED">someone is paying attention</a> to Linux users.  While the <a title="Central Command - Linux Antivirus Windows Antivirus Solaris Antivirus FreeBSD Antivirus OpenBSD Antivirus Milter Antivirus" href="http://www.centralcommand.com/index.html">Vexira Central Command </a> app is designed primarily for mail servers, the product does include embedded anti-virus and anti-spyware functionality as well.  Vexira does make a standalone anti-virus product for Linux, but it is still a bit behind - being applicable to the 2.2.X kernel.</p>
<p>I would be interested (and enthused) to see Vexira extend some of this to the desktop.  In the meantime, if anyone out there knows of others doing this, please let me know.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/28/paying-attention-to-linux-needs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spyware purveyor sued in class action</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/10/spyware-purveyor-sued-in-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/10/spyware-purveyor-sued-in-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DirectRevenue]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/spyware-purveyor-sued-in-class-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DirectRevenue, the ad outfit turned spyware vendor (and name change addict - see Is This Software On Your Hard Drive?) has been sued for alleged computer hijacking.  The lawsuit contends that DirectRevenue&#8217;s software willfully disregards plaintiffs&#8217; rights to use and enjoy their personal property,&#8221; and is purposely damn hard to get rid of as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>DirectRevenue, the ad outfit turned spyware vendor (and name change addict - see <a title="Is This Software On Your Hard Drive? - Newsweek Technology - MSNBC.com" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6689667/site/newsweek/" target="">Is This Software On Your Hard Drive?</a>) has been sued for alleged computer hijacking.  The lawsuit contends that DirectRevenue&#8217;s software <cite>willfully disregards plaintiffs&#8217; rights to use and enjoy their personal property,&#8221;</cite> and is purposely damn hard to get rid of as well.<br />
<span id="more-488"></span><br />
I love to piss and moan about how people aren&#8217;t approaching an issue in a sensible and orderly manner, but I certainly have no problem with adware vendors getting the daylights sued out of them.  They prey on unsophisticated users, plain and simple, and they should be made an example of.</p>
<p>I am not surprised that Microsoft has recently chosen to <a title="InfoWorld: Microsoft's Sybari acquisition highlights security strategy" href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/techwatch/archives/001076.html" target="">purchase a security outfit</a>, but I am surprised that they have not been more heavily involved in the legal (and other) aspects of spy/ad/malware.  Now that there is a case headed for class action, I would like to make a couple of requests&#8230;</p>
<p>1) That Microsoft stick to <a title="Spamroll: Microsoft Phishing Lawsuits" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/04/01/microsoft-phishing-lawsuits/">chasing phishers</a> (we need all the help we can get there), and stay out of this legal mess; and</p>
<p>2) That the class request everyone who purchased a <a href="http://www.apple.com/" target="">Mac</a> in the last 12 months to avoid spy/ad/malware get reimbursed for the purchase, and that the remaining class members all get new Macs.  As an alternative, send everyone in the class a questionnaire so they can detail their hardware specifications, and use those details to burn custom copies of a <a title="DistroWatch.com: Put the fun back into computing. Use Linux, BSD." href="http://distrowatch.com/" target="">Linux distro</a> specifically for their needs.</p>
<p>All in jest, of course, but good to see that someone finally had the gumption to take these slimeballs on.</p>
<p>Catch the unabridged version of the story in <a title="Spyware Lawsuit Alleges Computer Hijacking" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1782649,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">Spyware Lawsuit Alleges Computer Hijacking</a> from eWeek, without all the comic relief.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/10/spyware-purveyor-sued-in-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I know someone needs one of these</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/29/i-know-someone-needs-one-of-these/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/29/i-know-someone-needs-one-of-these/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[small computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague is working on cramming an awful lot of gear into a very tight space, and trying to get it all to run on a custom kernel configuration.  But it just doesn&#8217;t compare to the following: Linux system squishes into Ethernet connector.

I have no particular need for a Linux box the size of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>A colleague is working on cramming an awful lot of gear into a very tight space, and trying to get it all to run on a custom kernel configuration.  But it just doesn&#8217;t compare to the following: <a title="Linux system squishes into Ethernet connector" href="http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS8386088053.html">Linux system squishes into Ethernet connector</a>.<br />
<span id="more-73"></span><br />
I have no particular need for a Linux box the size of my thumb, and I hope those that do have a significant other, a dog, or some hobby to balance out their lives.  Meanwhile, it gives the rest of us an inkling of things to come.</p>
<p>The Slashdot crowd had this to say in <a title="Slashdot | World's Smallest Linux Box Fits in RJ-45 Jack" href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/05/03/28/2237230.shtml?tid=137&#038;tid=106">World&#8217;s Smallest Linux Box Fits in RJ-45 Jack</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/29/i-know-someone-needs-one-of-these/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
