<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Sleazy Friday Links</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/13/sleazy-friday-links/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/13/sleazy-friday-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alex Kozinski]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sleaze]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/13/sleazy-friday-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting ready for the weekend
 Topping the sleaze charts:
Government officials got big loan discounts from Countrywide.  &#8220;Friends of Angelo&#8221; included, who else, but the heads of congressional banking and finance committees.  Note - these folks voted for a government mortgage bailout plan, and no wonder - they&#8217;re getting foreclosed on.
Voted &#8220;Best Value From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><em>Getting ready for the weekend</em></p>
<ul> Topping the sleaze charts:</p>
<li>Government officials got <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/06/12/Countrywide-Loan-Scandal">big loan discounts from Countrywide</a>.  &#8220;Friends of Angelo&#8221; included, who else, but the heads of congressional banking and finance committees.  Note - these folks voted for a government mortgage bailout plan, and no wonder - <a href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/06/richardson-update-this-workout-smells.html">they&#8217;re getting foreclosed on</a>.</li>
<p>Voted &#8220;Best Value From Your Stimulus Check&#8221;:</p>
<li>To hell with <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/12/in-2065-the-commerce-dept-will-begin-reporting-unit-sales/">retail purchases</a> - get &#8220;<a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/06/more-bang-for-t.html">more bang</a>&#8221; for your stimulus check dollar.  A new &#8220;core inflation&#8221; measure is just around the corner&#8230;ex food and energy and sexual favors.</li>
<p>And last and least:</p>
<li>A judge recuses himself from obscenity case over a purportedly obscene website, but it seems what was truly obscene was the <a href="http://lessig.org/blog/2008/06/the_kozinski_mess.html">media&#8217;s lack of fact finding standards</a>.  The media will continue to cry about the internet killing them, never understanding the simple truth - their product is for shit.</li>
</ul>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/13/sleazy-friday-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New World Meaning to &#8220;Betrayed by the Media&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/23/new-world-meaning-to-betrayed-by-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/23/new-world-meaning-to-betrayed-by-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/new-world-meaning-to-betrayed-by-the-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Dershowitz and Bill Bennett collaborate:
&#8220;We two come from different political and philosophical perspectives, but on this we agree: Over the past few weeks, the press has betrayed not only its duties but its responsibilities.&#8221; - via Instapundit.com
I&#8217;ll bet the botnet building sucker who was &#8220;inadvertently&#8221; outed by the Washington Post is agreeing with those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Alan Dershowitz and Bill Bennett collaborate:</p>
<p><cite>&#8220;We two come from different political and philosophical perspectives, but on this we agree: Over the past few weeks, the press has betrayed not only its duties but its responsibilities.&#8221;</cite> - via <a title="Instapundit.com - " href="http://instapundit.com/archives/028765.php" target="">Instapundit.com</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet the botnet building sucker who <a title="Washington Post Caught in Metadata Gaffe?" href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1930512,00.asp" target="">was &#8220;inadvertently&#8221; outed by the Washington Post</a> is agreeing with those guys too.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel the least bit sorry for him.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/02/23/new-world-meaning-to-betrayed-by-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online reporting protection dies quietly</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/03/online-reporting-protection-dies-quietly/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/03/online-reporting-protection-dies-quietly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You aren&#8217;t going to find any scoops here, as I don&#8217;t pay much attention to politicians or celebrities, and I think the media is &#8220;pre-paid.&#8221;  So it doesn&#8217;t really matter to me whether this site is afforded the same protections as the mainstream media.  Nonetheless, we are all one big community, so it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>You aren&#8217;t going to find any scoops here, as I don&#8217;t pay much attention to politicians or celebrities, and I think the media is &#8220;pre-paid.&#8221;  So it doesn&#8217;t really matter to me whether this site is afforded the same protections as the mainstream media.  Nonetheless, we are all one big community, so it is a bummer to hear the <a title="Daily Kos: Friends" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/11/3/52053/6206">Onine Freedom of Speech Act died</a>.<br />
<span id="more-139"></span><br />
Nevertheless, I will thank John Salazar (D-CO) and Mark Udall (D-CO) for at least trying.  Someone gets it, even if many don&#8217;t.  Meanwhile, we can look forward to continued battles - the mainstream media will continue to spew nonsense, and some smart bloggers will continue to out them.  What fun!</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/03/online-reporting-protection-dies-quietly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of the News Media</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/02/state-of-the-news-media/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/02/state-of-the-news-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalism.org recently released their 2005 report on the state of the news media.  We have seen a lot of interesting changes taking place in news.  Participatory journalism, centering on the blogosphere, has been the main event.  But lets not forget the battles Google News has had and is having, The New York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Journalism.org recently released their 2005 report on the state of the news media.  We have seen a lot of interesting changes taking place in news.  Participatory journalism, centering on the blogosphere, has been the main event.  But lets not forget the battles Google News has had and is having, The New York Times purchase of About.com, and the number of longtime nightly news anchors calling it quits.</p>
<p>I think this latest report may shed some light on the underlying issues which created some of the events above, as well as what the future holds.  While not a quick read, the report can be printed in parts from the index.  You can find it here: <a title="State of the News Media" href="http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2005/printingthereport.asp">State of the News Media</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/02/state-of-the-news-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on the Blogging Assault</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/02/17/more-on-the-blogging-assault/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/02/17/more-on-the-blogging-assault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mark Cuban]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[traditional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Cuban has a follow-up on bloggers pounding traditional media.  In Political Bloggers - the new paparazzi, Mark  presents the case for mass media outlets to stay on alert over this new force in reporting.
Mr. Cuban suggests that traditional media outlets are going to see continued and accelerating activity from the blogging community, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Mark Cuban has a follow-up on bloggers pounding traditional media.  In <a title="Political Bloggers - the new paparazzi - Blog Maverick - www.blogmaverick.com" href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000787031740/">Political Bloggers - the new paparazzi</a>, Mark  presents the case for mass media outlets to stay on alert over this new force in reporting.</p>
<p>Mr. Cuban suggests that traditional media outlets are going to see continued and accelerating activity from the blogging community, and that more prime-time reporters&#8217; heads may roll as a result.  I couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
<p>Mark also suggested that the powers that be could head off this onslaught by showing some respect for the blogging community, and maybe even invite them in for a little tea and crumpets.  I couldn&#8217;t agree more, again.</p>
<p>But it just won&#8217;t happen.  There is too much money (and arrogance) at play here.  I suspect the bloodbath will continue.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, when is my streamed, holographic, scent dispersing, &#8220;jump-into-the-set&#8221; programming going to start, Mark?</p>
<p>You can read my original, comic post <a href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/02/13/leftists-getting-maraudered-byleftists/">here</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/02/17/more-on-the-blogging-assault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
