<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; MessageLabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/messagelabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>VeriTest Anti-Spam Benchmark first-round test results in</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/21/veritest-anti-spam-benchmark-first-round-test-results-in/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/21/veritest-anti-spam-benchmark-first-round-test-results-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barracuda]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finjan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lionbridge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MessageLabs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Veritest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/veritest-anti-spam-benchmark-first-round-test-results-in/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veritest, a subsidiary of global maintenance and testing company Lionbridge, has announced the results of its first round of benchmarking in the anti-spam software arena.
Veritest&#8217;s first round includes three packages, and here is how they fared..

For out-of-the-box performance,  MessageLabs Anti-Spam Service and Finjan Software Internet 1Box tied for first, with Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Veritest, a subsidiary of global maintenance and testing company <a title="Lionbridge: Software Localization, Content Development, Web Globalization, Application Maintenance" href="http://www.lionbridge.com/">Lionbridge</a>, has <a title="VERITEST ANNOUNCES ANTI-SPAM BENCHMARK SERVICE RESULTS" href="http://www.veritest.com/about/news/press/pr_anti-spam_first_test.asp">announced</a> the results of its first round of benchmarking in the anti-spam software arena.</p>
<p>Veritest&#8217;s first round includes three packages, and here is how they fared..<br />
<span id="more-538"></span><br />
For out-of-the-box performance,  MessageLabs Anti-Spam Service and Finjan Software Internet 1Box tied for first, with Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall coming in a close second;</p>
<p>In a vendor tuned environment, MessageLabs again took top honors, with Finjan and Barracuda products tied for second.</p>
<p>You can view the drilled-down results (meaning how Veritest compiled them), at the <a title="VeriTest Anti-Spam Benchmark Service" href="http://www.veritest.com/services/anti-spam/default_report.asp">VeriTest Anti-Spam Benchmark Service</a> site.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/21/veritest-anti-spam-benchmark-first-round-test-results-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MCI upgrades Managed Email</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mci-upgrades-managed-email/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mci-upgrades-managed-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[content control]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MCI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MessageLabs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/mci-upgrades-managed-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MCI has upgraded their managed email services for business to include anti-spam and anti-virus enhancements, as well content control measures for both inbound and outbound traffic.  This is likely a response to Symantec&#8217;s recent jump into the managed email space, and Spamroll will be looking for reviews from the &#8220;outside world&#8221; on both.
Meanwhile..

The addition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>MCI has upgraded their managed email services for business to include anti-spam and anti-virus enhancements, as well content control measures for both inbound and outbound traffic.  This is likely a response to Symantec&#8217;s recent jump into the managed email space, and Spamroll will be looking for reviews from the &#8220;outside world&#8221; on both.</p>
<p>Meanwhile..<br />
<span id="more-447"></span><br />
The addition of content control is an interesting one; something we are seeing a lot more of in the corporate realm.  MCI&#8217;s enhancement is based on the <a href="http://www.messagelabs.com/">MessageLabs</a> Image Composition Analysis (ICA) technology, which uses artificial intelligence to scan the subject, body and attachments of email for pre-programmed key words.  Its purpose is to prevent inappropriate, malicious and/or confidential subject matter from permeating the network.</p>
<p>See <a title="RedNova News - Technology - MCI Delivers Four-Way Protection With Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus Solution For Businesses" href="http://www.rednova.com/news/technology/139686/mci_delivers_fourway_protection_with_antispam_antivirus_solution_for_businesses/index.html">MCI Delivers Four-Way Protection With Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus Solution For Businesses</a> from Rednova, for additional details.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/31/mci-upgrades-managed-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec Enters Hosting Market</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/24/symantec-enters-hosting-market/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/24/symantec-enters-hosting-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MessageLabs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Postini]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/symantec-enters-hosting-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not unexpected, but Symantec, our fearless leader of producing 99% effective security protection tools, is going head on against Postini, MessageLabs, and the rest of the hosting family.

I assume that this service is being targeted at small businesses, much like Postini.  Depending on pricing, hosted email is usually a cost effective solution for businesses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Not unexpected, but Symantec, our fearless leader of producing 99% effective security protection tools, is going head on against <a href="http://www.postini.com/">Postini</a>, <a href="http://www.messagelabs.com/">MessageLabs</a>, and the rest of the hosting family.<br />
<span id="more-422"></span><br />
I assume that this service is being targeted at small businesses, much like Postini.  Depending on pricing, hosted email is usually a cost effective solution for businesses whose core is not technology based.</p>
<p>Read more at <a title="TechWeb | Symantec Hosted Mail Security | Symantec Heads Into Hosted Waters" href="http://www.techweb.com/wire/security/159904813">Symantec Heads Into Hosted Waters</a>, from TechWeb.</p>
<p>And, stay tuned for performance comparisons from the internal analysts of every hosted email provider on the planet.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/24/symantec-enters-hosting-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Threats peaked?  Whatever!</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/02/01/threats-peaked-whatever/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/02/01/threats-peaked-whatever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hotmail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mailscanner]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MessageLabs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Postini]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spamassassin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry Seltzer of eWeek has an interesting op-ed entitled More Evidence Spam Has Peaked.  Interesting, I say, as late in the article Larry points out a big reason why it might not have actually peaked (and why it may never go away).

Late, he notes that Postini, MessageLabs, Symantec, and others like them &#8220;don&#8217;t really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Larry Seltzer of eWeek has an interesting op-ed entitled <a title="More Evidence Spam Has Peaked" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1756981,00.asp">More Evidence Spam Has Peaked</a>.  Interesting, I say, as late in the article Larry points out a big reason why it might not have actually peaked (and why it may never go away).<br />
<span id="more-16"></span><br />
Late, he notes that Postini, MessageLabs, Symantec, and others like them &#8220;don&#8217;t really have an interest in spam going away, because their sales are proportional to the level of threat.  Ah ha.</p>
<p>Now we get to the root of the issue.  These firms don&#8217;t have a vested interested in ridding the natural world of computer threats, whether they be spam, viruses, phishing, zombies, whatever.  As long as the threats exist, these firms make a bundle convincing us they are saving us from them.</p>
<p>I personally rely on some of their wares, but only when running Windows, and then only as an &#8220;additional&#8221; countermeasure.  I have a huge (and growing) block in my server&#8217;s Sendmail reject list, and make sure MailScanner is always running.  According to industry reports, MailScanner has more users than AOL and Hotmail combined.  The SpamAssassin component rarely fails me.</p>
<p>Funny thing is, this front end protection mechanism is open source, and is provided as part of the Linux distro this site runs on.  THESE  wares don&#8217;t cost anything extra, and they are distributed via the open source community.  OS to the rescue once again.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/02/01/threats-peaked-whatever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
