<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; net neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Save the internet, and drown in the process</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/20/save-the-internet-and-drown-in-the-process/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/20/save-the-internet-and-drown-in-the-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A really technical guy talks net neutrality, and how all the partisan positioning may wind up killing the internet altogether.
Death of the internet, or just a slowing of its growth via lack of innovation - it makes no difference.  None of this bodes well for the web hermit.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>A really technical guy talks net neutrality, and how all the partisan positioning may wind up <a title="How 'Saving The Net' may kill it | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/17/net_neut_slow_death/" target="">killing the internet</a> altogether.</p>
<p>Death of the internet, or just a slowing of its growth via lack of innovation - it makes no difference.  None of this bodes well for <a title="bit-tech.net | The Age of the Web Hermit" href="http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2006/07/17/The_Age_of_the_Web_Hermit/1.html" target="">the web hermit</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/20/save-the-internet-and-drown-in-the-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net neutrality debate may not matter</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-debate-may-not-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-debate-may-not-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the talk of net neutrality, government snooping, and telco conspiracies, you&#8217;d think that web companies would be worried sick.  Yet, nobody is running around like a chicken with their head cut off.  Techdirt Mike thinks government meddling is going to increase the use of encryption technologies, and I could not agree [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>With all the talk of net neutrality, government snooping, and telco conspiracies, you&#8217;d think that web companies would be worried sick.  Yet, nobody is running around like a chicken with their head cut off.  Techdirt Mike thinks <a title="Techdirt: How The Telcos And The Government Are About To Boost The Encryption Market" href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060621/1251235.shtml" target="">government meddling is going to increase the use of encryption technologies</a>, and I could not agree more.  I also believe that is exactly why those slaughtered chicken imitators are so scarce.  Internet buffs (and drooling entrepreneurs) know something the bureaucrats can&#8217;t ever figure out - like life itself, technology always seems &#8220;to find a way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Get ready for open, cheap, hardcore stealth communications of the likes you may have never dreamed about (unless you are Kevin Mitnick or Bruce Schneier or Phil Zimmerman).  It will be here sooner than you think.</p>
<p>PS: to add to the mess and the potential for distraction: as EmailBattles notes, <a title="More Private Data Is Burgled From Government Than Hacked" href="http://www.emailbattles.com/archive/battles/idtheft_aaejhcjbai_hi/" target="">more data is stolen from governments via burglary than hacking</a>.  The government should be worrying more about lock and key, security door, and window bar manufacturers, which in all their intelligence and glory they will probably move to regulate forthwith.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-debate-may-not-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net neutrality gets a word in edgewise</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/26/net-neutrality-gets-a-word-in-edgewise/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/26/net-neutrality-gets-a-word-in-edgewise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, Congress debates the issue; now the House approved a bill (no comment on it&#8217;s contents).  Let&#8217;s see how far this goes.
Meanwhile, for those who still don&#8217;t understand what &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; is all about, the BBC has a nice piece which uses auto traffic as a metaphor for explaining the concept.  Maybe having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>First, Congress <a title="Senate, House Debate Net Neutrality" href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1968212,00.asp?kc=ETRSS02129TX1K0000532" target="">debates the issue</a>; now the House <a title="Slashdot | House Committee Approves 'Net Neutrality' Bill" href="http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/26/177215&#038;from=rss" target="">approved a bill</a> (no comment on it&#8217;s contents).  Let&#8217;s see how far this goes.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, for those who still don&#8217;t understand what &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; is all about, the BBC has a <a title="BBC NEWS | Programmes | Newsnight Home | BitTorrent: Shedding no tiers" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/5017542.stm" target="">nice piece</a> which uses auto traffic as a metaphor for explaining the concept.  Maybe having a custom SUV or pickup, with oversized off-road tires and a big bumper/grill guard (with an integrated winch) is the answer.  Is there an internet equivalent to one of <a title="International : CXT" href="http://www.internationaldelivers.com/site_layout/XTFamily/cxt.asp" target="">these</a>?  At least people will get out of the way, eh?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/26/net-neutrality-gets-a-word-in-edgewise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for a telecomm &#8220;trade&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/16/time-for-a-telecomm-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/16/time-for-a-telecomm-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[telecomm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[telecomm, net neutrality, NSA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The recently announced NSA/Telco data sharing fiasco is <a title="Slashdot | Telecoms Facing $50 Billion Lawsuit for Wiretaps" href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/13/2253200" target="">setting off a wave of lawsuits</a>.  <a title="Schneier on Security: NSA Eavesdropping" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/05/nsa_eavesdroppi.html" target="">Make jokes</a> if you must, in light of the situation (which I don&#8217;t personally think is a big deal - I don&#8217;t get any phone calls anyway).  But I do think - how timely!</p>
<p>The telcos are in the middle of a <a title="Thought Market: Telcos back off, then go for the throat" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/04/telcos-back-off-then-go-for-the-throat/" target="">&#8220;net neutrality&#8221; fight</a>, and I wish someone would properly communicate the bigger picture - the telco&#8217;s <a title="Thought Market: Telcos hard pressed to tell straight story" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/29/telcos-hard-pressed-to-tell-straight-story/" target="">certainly can&#8217;t</a>.</p>
<p>The time is now - trade a quick sweep of this issue under the carpet in return for perpetually free access across the pipes.<br />
<span id="more-300"></span><br />
Of course, that is exactly the opposite of what telecomm executives were thinking when they agreed to the data sharing plan in the first place.</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Of course, BellSouth now joins Qwest in the <a title="BellSouth Denies NSA Contract" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1963033,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">&#8220;we didn&#8217;t do it&#8221;</a> category.  I&#8217;ve been pretty hard on telecomms for not getting the innovation thing - unfortunately, having a few players in the mix with plenty of chips remaining makes this whole net-neutrality poker game idea pretty hard to pull off.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/16/time-for-a-telecomm-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
