<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>And the winner of the &#8216;Clueless Headline of the Week&#8217; Award goes to&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/16/and-the-winner-of-the-clueless-headline-of-the-week-award-goes-to.../</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/16/and-the-winner-of-the-clueless-headline-of-the-week-award-goes-to.../#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clueless]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=3596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;the New York Times, for A Sense That Wall St.’s Boom Times Are Over.
Have they been hiding in a cave for the last year or what?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>&#8230;the New York Times, for <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/business/16future.html?_r=1&#038;em&#038;oref=slogin">A Sense That Wall St.’s Boom Times Are Over</a></em>.</p>
<p>Have they been hiding in a cave for the last year or what?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/16/and-the-winner-of-the-clueless-headline-of-the-week-award-goes-to.../feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is The New York Times releasing proprietary readers?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/23/why-is-the-new-york-times-releasing-proprietary-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/23/why-is-the-new-york-times-releasing-proprietary-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news reader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[proprietary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/23/why-is-the-new-york-times-releasing-proprietary-readers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via (where else) but The New York Times:
Today our beta version of Times Reader for the Mac becomes available. The beta is free for all registered members of NYTimes.com to download and try.
From perusal of the comments, most are none too happy about installing the Microsoft Silverlight plugin in order to make this &#8220;reader&#8221; work.
Silverlight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Via (where else) but <a href="http://firstlook.nytimes.com/?p=49">The New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Today our beta version of Times Reader for the Mac becomes available. The beta is free for all registered members of NYTimes.com to download and try.</p></blockquote>
<p>From perusal of the comments, most are none too happy about installing the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/">Microsoft Silverlight</a> plugin in order to make this &#8220;reader&#8221; work.</p>
<p>Silverlight or no Silverlight, I won&#8217;t be installing this application either.  I already have a <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/22/revisiting-newsgator-makes-a-fan-out-of-me/">news reader</a>, and it works just fine.  Should Marc Andreessen continue the New York Times <a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/02/inaugurating-th.html">deathwatch</a>?</p>
<p>UPDATE: The Alley Insider is <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/5/more_new_cool_ny_times_features_that_won_t_help_the_ny_times">unimpressed</a> as well.</p>
<p>UPDATE 2: The <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/2515864053/">plugin is a problem</a> anyway.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/23/why-is-the-new-york-times-releasing-proprietary-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Times Timing&#8230;Not So Prescient</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/18/the-times-timingnot-so-prescient/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/18/the-times-timingnot-so-prescient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Times Select]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/18/the-times-timingnot-so-prescient/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has opened up their pay wall, Times Select, citing the need to embrace search engine traffic and online advertising.
Meanwhile, they&#8217;re bleeding to death, and smart folks are calling for a web shakeout.
Next stop?  Google buys them, in bankruptcy court?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The New York Times has <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/09/17/times-deselected/">opened up their pay wall</a>, Times Select, citing the need to embrace search engine traffic and online advertising.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/09/nyt-the-picture.html">bleeding to death</a>, and smart folks are <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/09/tough-times-ahe.html">calling for a web shakeout</a>.</p>
<p>Next stop?  <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/17/will-google-kill-old-media-or-the-other-way-around/">Google buys them</a>, in bankruptcy court?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/18/the-times-timingnot-so-prescient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fake Steve Jobs weekend roundup</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/06/the-fake-steve-jobs-weekend-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/06/the-fake-steve-jobs-weekend-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fake Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Groklaw]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/06/the-fake-steve-jobs-weekend-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was fishing, thereby missing the action&#8230;.NOT
The New York Times has spoiled the fun.
Fake Steve agrees, noting &#8220;people around the world have been robbed of their sense of childlike wonder.&#8221;
Mainstream media now rushes in to sponsor FSJ.
Pamela Jones says Dan Lyons is a hypocrite, just in case you &#8220;want to sue.&#8221;
I can only suspect FSJ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><em>I was fishing, thereby missing the action&#8230;.NOT</em></p>
<p>The New York Times has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/06/technology/06steve.html?ei=5088&amp;en=f826e2e579cf8ea4&amp;ex=1344052800&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;adxnnlx=1186405893-VvtqPiHzh70nHcE9v8LUrw">spoiled the fun</a>.</p>
<p>Fake Steve <a href="http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2007/08/damn-i-am-so-busted-yo.html">agrees</a>, noting &#8220;people around the world have been robbed of their sense of childlike wonder.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mainstream media now <a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/08/05/fsj-blog-apple-biz-media-cx_pm_0805fsj.html">rushes in to sponsor FSJ</a>.</p>
<p>Pamela Jones says <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070805195515884">Dan Lyons is a hypocrite</a>, just in case you &#8220;want to sue.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can only suspect FSJ will be short on comments from here on out.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/06/the-fake-steve-jobs-weekend-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Botnets hit the Sunday paper</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/07/botnets-hit-the-sunday-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/07/botnets-hit-the-sunday-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rustock]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[zombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/botnets-hit-the-sunday-paper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t help but smile with glee over this&#8230;
The issue of zombies and the problems they cause on the networks has hit the New York Times.
No, I am not happy because the New York Times is my favorite paper or anything; my joy comes from the awareness it is providing.  Too many people just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I can&#8217;t help but smile with glee over this&#8230;</p>
<p>The issue of zombies and the problems they cause on the networks has <a title="Attack of the Zombie Computers Is Growing Threat - New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/technology/07net.html">hit the New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>No, I am not happy because the New York Times is my favorite paper or anything; my joy comes from the awareness it is providing.  Too many people just don&#8217;t get it (until the police show up)&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Serry Winkler, a sales representative in Denver, said that she had turned off the network-security software provided by her Internet service provider because it slowed performance to a crawl on her PC, which was running Windows 98. A few months ago four sheriff’s deputies pounded on her apartment door to confiscate the PC, which they said was being used to order goods from Sears with a stolen credit card. The computer, it turned out, had been commandeered by an intruder who was using it remotely.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s one way to find out your computer has been hijacked.  And while reading the paper isn&#8217;t going to fix the problem, at least it might make you aware that one could exist.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Bruce Schneier agrees - <a title="Schneier on Security: Wi-Fi Eavesdropping" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/01/wifi_eavesdropp.html">popular attention</a> is a good thing.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/07/botnets-hit-the-sunday-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of the News Media</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/02/state-of-the-news-media/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/02/state-of-the-news-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalism.org recently released their 2005 report on the state of the news media.  We have seen a lot of interesting changes taking place in news.  Participatory journalism, centering on the blogosphere, has been the main event.  But lets not forget the battles Google News has had and is having, The New York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Journalism.org recently released their 2005 report on the state of the news media.  We have seen a lot of interesting changes taking place in news.  Participatory journalism, centering on the blogosphere, has been the main event.  But lets not forget the battles Google News has had and is having, The New York Times purchase of About.com, and the number of longtime nightly news anchors calling it quits.</p>
<p>I think this latest report may shed some light on the underlying issues which created some of the events above, as well as what the future holds.  While not a quick read, the report can be printed in parts from the index.  You can find it here: <a title="State of the News Media" href="http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2005/printingthereport.asp">State of the News Media</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/04/02/state-of-the-news-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spamalot Not Too Entertaining</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/spamalot-not-too-entertaining/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/spamalot-not-too-entertaining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Monty Python]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spamalot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/spamalot-not-too-entertaining/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major news wires, the blogging community, the technology forum community, and everyone else on the planet, has picked up on this story from The New York Times entitled ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The major news wires, the blogging community, the technology forum community, and everyone else on the planet, has picked up on this story from The New York Times entitled <a title="The New York Times > Theater > News &#038; Features > What to Expect of &#8216;Spamalot&#8217;? A Lot of Spam&#8221; href=&#8221;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/12/theater/newsandfeatures/12hack.html?ex=1268370000&#038;en=6b3ecb315a1c0d20&#038;ei=5090&#8243;>What to Expect of &#8216;Spamalot&#8217;? A Lot of Spam</a>.</p>
<p>Now Spamroll has it too.  So what?</p>
<p>Beyond the cutsie cute irony of the Monty Python skit references and all, it begs the question&#8230;how and why did this happen?<br />
<span id="more-386"></span><br />
That question is partially explained thought the analysis of the technical exploit and the folks that made it happen.  The article fingers an unnamed web designer/programmer, and then everyone goes on to say how terrible it is.  Spamroll is more interested in the human implications.</p>
<p>This is one more example - if you put your email address into a form on the web, don&#8217;t be surprised if it winds up in the wrong hands.  Furthermore, it can cause permanent damage - meaning just because the security breach in question is now &#8220;fixed&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean your email address is.  Its out in the open, like the NOC list from <cite> Mission Impossible</cite>.  You are going to get spammed more, regardless of anyone&#8217;s efforts.  If some people decided it was harmless to use their work address, now a sys admin has to deal with the issue (I hope he or she is pissed, too, and lets everyone know it).  If it a personal address, well the user just has to deal with the problem on their own (tough luck, boys and girls).</p>
<p>Users need to think hard BEFORE they enter an online drawing, contest, or even a &#8220;temporary&#8221; notification.  What seems to have a limited lifetime (in this case, a newsletter for a Broadway musical that will eventually run its course), may often have much broader implications.</p>
<p>Folks, you have to THINK before you pull the trigger.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/14/spamalot-not-too-entertaining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
