<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; NSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/nsa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Spy agency help Microsoft build Vista</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/09/spy-agency-help-microsoft-build-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/09/spy-agency-help-microsoft-build-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/spy-agency-help-microsoft-build-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may have been a good move to get some hardcore security guys involved in the development of Vista, but a lot of people are going to question why Microsoft looked to the NSA, which has been under fire recently for spying on people at the request of the Bush Administration.
Adding fuel to the upcoming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>It may have been a good move to get some hardcore security guys involved in the development of Vista, but a lot of people are going to question why Microsoft <a title="For Windows Vista Security, Microsoft Called in Pros - washingtonpost.com" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/08/AR2007010801352.html">looked to the NSA</a>, which has been under fire recently for spying on people at the request of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>Adding fuel to the upcoming fire&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>The Redmond, Wash., software maker declined to be specific about the contributions the NSA made to secure the Windows operating system.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then again, maybe the idea was to position the upcoming operating system to be used by political bloggers, and/or throw a bone to the 110th Congress&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>The NSA also declined to be specific but said it used two groups &#8212; a &#8220;red team&#8221; and a &#8220;blue team&#8221; &#8212; to test Vista&#8217;s security. The red team, for instance, posed as &#8220;the determined, technically competent adversary&#8221; to disrupt, corrupt or steal information. &#8220;They pretend to be bad guys,&#8221; Sager said. The blue team helped Defense Department system administrators with Vista&#8217;s configuration .</p></blockquote>
<p>So the &#8220;blue team&#8221; were the good guys.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m wondering whether the only one that is going to turn out bad or good is the Microsoft PR Team, when the whole concept spins in or out of control.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Bruce Schneier asks: <a title="Schneier on Security: NSA Helps Microsoft with Windows Vista" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/01/nsa_helps_micro_1.html">Is this a good idea or not?</a></p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/01/09/spy-agency-help-microsoft-build-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qwest serious about privacy, or just politics and PR</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/08/23/qwest-serious-about-privacy-or-just-politics-and-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/08/23/qwest-serious-about-privacy-or-just-politics-and-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Qwest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/qwest-serious-about-privacy-or-just-politics-and-pr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qwest was recently praised for ingoring a request from the NSA for data on it&#8217;s subscribers.  They looked like good guys and gals.  People purportedly rushed to get their services.  Their employees certainly ran around town, chatting it up.
Fast forward.
Qwest is at it again, only this time the talk is heavy endorsement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/qwest_logo.gif" alt="qwest_logo.gif" align="right" height="123" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="170" />Qwest was recently praised for <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-12-hayden-support_x.htm" title="USATODAY.com - Lawyer: Ex-Qwest exec ignored NSA request">ingoring a request from the NSA</a> for data on it&#8217;s subscribers.  They looked like good guys and gals.  People purportedly rushed to get their services.  Their employees certainly ran around town, chatting it up.</p>
<p>Fast forward.</p>
<p>Qwest is at it again, only this time the talk is <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6108279.html?part=rss&amp;tag=6108279&amp;subj=news" title="Qwest calls for mandatory data retention laws | CNET News.com">heavy endorsement of mandatory data retention laws</a> being proposed for ISPs.  Several Colorado politicians who had previously jumped on the Qwest hero worship are endorsing (and in one case, sponsoring) said measures.</p>
<p>The local Rocky Mountain News had <a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/tech/article/0,2777,DRMN_23910_4692718,00.html" title="Rocky Mountain News: Tech &amp; telecom">noted</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Qwest has done its share to reinvent the company in recent years, but it may have generated an unexpected windfall by rebuffing the National Security Agency.</p></blockquote>
<p>So..now that they have all those subscribers, what are they going to do with all that extra data they want to retain?  Let&#8217;s just hope they don&#8217;t pull &#8220;<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/" title="Techcrunch Blog Archive AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data">an AOL</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Oops.  Someone at a big telco <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6108926.html?part=rss&amp;tag=6108926&amp;subj=news" title="Qwest on data retention laws: Oops | CNET News.com">has admitted they misspoke</a>, which has to be a first: Qwest endorses a more reasonable local law, not the federal mandate.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/08/23/qwest-serious-about-privacy-or-just-politics-and-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for a telecomm &#8220;trade&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/16/time-for-a-telecomm-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/16/time-for-a-telecomm-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[telecomm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[telecomm, net neutrality, NSA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The recently announced NSA/Telco data sharing fiasco is <a title="Slashdot | Telecoms Facing $50 Billion Lawsuit for Wiretaps" href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/13/2253200" target="">setting off a wave of lawsuits</a>.  <a title="Schneier on Security: NSA Eavesdropping" href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/05/nsa_eavesdroppi.html" target="">Make jokes</a> if you must, in light of the situation (which I don&#8217;t personally think is a big deal - I don&#8217;t get any phone calls anyway).  But I do think - how timely!</p>
<p>The telcos are in the middle of a <a title="Thought Market: Telcos back off, then go for the throat" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/04/telcos-back-off-then-go-for-the-throat/" target="">&#8220;net neutrality&#8221; fight</a>, and I wish someone would properly communicate the bigger picture - the telco&#8217;s <a title="Thought Market: Telcos hard pressed to tell straight story" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/03/29/telcos-hard-pressed-to-tell-straight-story/" target="">certainly can&#8217;t</a>.</p>
<p>The time is now - trade a quick sweep of this issue under the carpet in return for perpetually free access across the pipes.<br />
<span id="more-300"></span><br />
Of course, that is exactly the opposite of what telecomm executives were thinking when they agreed to the data sharing plan in the first place.</p>
<p>***UPDATE***</p>
<p>Of course, BellSouth now joins Qwest in the <a title="BellSouth Denies NSA Contract" href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1963033,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">&#8220;we didn&#8217;t do it&#8221;</a> category.  I&#8217;ve been pretty hard on telecomms for not getting the innovation thing - unfortunately, having a few players in the mix with plenty of chips remaining makes this whole net-neutrality poker game idea pretty hard to pull off.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/16/time-for-a-telecomm-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSA&#8217;s Hands Deep in the Cookie Jar</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/29/nsas-hands-deep-in-the-cookie-jar/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/29/nsas-hands-deep-in-the-cookie-jar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cookies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NSA has been snagged serving cookies to it&#8217;s website visitors&#8217; computers, despite federal rules against the practice.  The cookies expire when?  2035.  Hmm.  Who else does such things?
They had an excuse - an overlooked software upgrade.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Bush Administration now pins the whole spying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The NSA has been snagged <a title="RED HERRING | NSA Caught Serving Cookies" href="http://www.redherring.com/article.aspx?a=15085" target="">serving cookies to it&#8217;s website visitors&#8217; computers</a>, despite federal rules against the practice.  The cookies expire when?  2035.  Hmm.  Who else does such things?</p>
<p>They had an excuse - an overlooked software upgrade.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Bush Administration now pins the whole spying fiasco on the NSA, citing a rogue macro in Word that screws up court orders.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/29/nsas-hands-deep-in-the-cookie-jar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Child Left Behind working after all?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/26/no-child-left-behind-working-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/26/no-child-left-behind-working-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CryptoKids]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks I know in the education space, including some teachers, a few policy makers, and the higher-ups at a couple of for-profit institutions, have pissed and moaned about the Bush Administration&#8217;s No Child Left Behind program.  I&#8217;ve heard funding is the big issue, but I can&#8217;t opine on the matter myself, as education [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img alt="nochildlb.jpg" src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/nochildlb.jpg" align="right" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="72" height="48" />The folks I know in the education space, including some teachers, a few policy makers, and the higher-ups at a couple of for-profit institutions, have pissed and moaned about the Bush Administration&#8217;s <a title="No Child Left Behind - ED.gov" href="http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml" target="blank">No Child Left Behind</a> program.  I&#8217;ve heard funding is the big issue, but I can&#8217;t opine on the matter myself, as education just isn&#8217;t my &#8220;business.&#8221;  But I see a covert signs that NCLB is actually working.<br />
<span id="more-209"></span><br />
The Administration has been intercepting phone calls of people they say are terrorist-related.  The National Security Agency has been doing the dirty work.  Meanwhile, the NSA has also developed a program to identify the next generation of high-end surveillance personal - the codename&#8230;.<a title="CryptoKids%u2122 America's Future Codemakers &#038; Codebreakers" href="http://www.nsa.gov/kids/home_html.cfm" target="">CryptoKids</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s where all the funding for education is going.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/26/no-child-left-behind-working-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
