<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; oil prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/oil-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The fine print wasn&#8217;t worth reading on this credit card offer</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/21/the-fine-print-wasnt-worth-reading-on-this-credit-card-offer/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/21/the-fine-print-wasnt-worth-reading-on-this-credit-card-offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=3698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an advertisement for a new gas rebate card from ConocoPhillips:

At $4.00 a gallon, you&#8217;d get a 40 cent rebate on each gallon.  So far, so good.  Unfortunately, your rebates are capped at $35, so there&#8217;s no rebate for you after you&#8217;ve pumped roughly 88 gallons into your tank.  For the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>This is an advertisement for a new gas rebate card from ConocoPhillips:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Medium" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelgracie/2876599661/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2063/2876599661_6c0e41aecb.jpg" alt="Gas Rebate Deal" width="500" height="371" /></a></p>
<p>At $4.00 a gallon, you&#8217;d get a 40 cent rebate on each gallon.  So far, so good.  Unfortunately, your rebates are capped at $35, so there&#8217;s no rebate for you after you&#8217;ve pumped roughly 88 gallons into your tank.  For the average SUV driving American, that means you&#8217;ll fill up your tank three, maybe four, times before your rebate disappeared. And if you decide to ride your bike to work four days a week to conserve gas, you&#8217;re out of luck - the rebate period only lasts 90 days.</p>
<p>But yeehaw - you&#8217;ll have a new credit card you can jack to the limit before you file bankruptcy!</p>
<p>NOTE: This offer is made especially for you by the fine folks at Citibank, who I hear are getting some sort of <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2008/09/21/we_all_should_g.html">bailout</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/21/the-fine-print-wasnt-worth-reading-on-this-credit-card-offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$200 oil gets farther away (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/15/200-oil-gets-farther-away/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/15/200-oil-gets-farther-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fuel consumption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[futures]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=3541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the price of a barrel of crude hit $150 during the summer, every bank on the Street (which after this weekend&#8217;s events can now be alternatively referred to as &#8220;the Pothole&#8221;) was touting the idea that we&#8217;d see $200 any moment.
Meanwhile, US consumers starting cutting back on fuel consumption - and their staying away [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>When the price of a barrel of crude hit $150 during the summer, every bank on the Street (which after <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/14/us-financial-sector-bailing-without-big-pail/">this weekend&#8217;s events</a> can now be alternatively referred to as &#8220;the Pothole&#8221;) was touting the idea that we&#8217;d see $200 any moment.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, US consumers starting cutting back on fuel consumption - and their staying away from the shopping malls meant our fine and friendly trading partners were spending less time counting their spare change as well.  That, or there are a whole lot of <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">evil</span> budding oil speculators kicking themselves right now&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Medium" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelgracie/2859132295/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3015/2859132295_f7c1d69b2a.jpg" border="0" alt="October Crude" width="500" height="294" /></a></p>
<p>It appears <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/09/are-we-in-the-peak-of-an-oil-bubble/">the bubble</a> has burst.  Or was that global demand hitting a wall?</p>
<p>UPDATE: Barry Ritholtz believes it&#8217;s pure and simple <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/09/crude-oil-92.html">demand destruction</a>.  And now that oil is &#8216;barreling&#8217; into the low 90s, it is a signal that there is further economic erosion head.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/09/15/200-oil-gets-farther-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brace yourself (be)for(e) &#8220;Nozzle Rage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/31/brace-yourself-before-nozzle-rage/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/31/brace-yourself-before-nozzle-rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=2550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/feOM_Va-JZ4&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/feOM_Va-JZ4&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/31/brace-yourself-before-nozzle-rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody Loves a Three-Year-Old SUV?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/25/nobody-loves-a-three-year-old-suv/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/25/nobody-loves-a-three-year-old-suv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FourRunner]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vehicles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=2387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you&#8217;re Toyota, I guess&#8230;
What Business Week is plowing onto the American public here is garbage, at least as far as this SUV owner is concerned.
Just as this article was coming out, I got a call from Toyota.  It seems my &#8220;contract is running out&#8221; ( i.e. I&#8217;m close to paying off my FourRunner). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><em>Unless you&#8217;re Toyota, I guess&#8230;</em></p>
<p>What Business Week <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_31/b4094064675897.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_news+%2B+analysis">is plowing onto the American public here</a> is garbage, at least as far as this SUV owner is concerned.</p>
<p>Just as this article was coming out, I got a call from Toyota.  It seems my &#8220;contract is running out&#8221; ( i.e. I&#8217;m close to paying off my FourRunner).  Toyota is contacting me, wondering whether I&#8217;d be willing to trade in this vehicle (now worth a bit more that Kelly Blue Book, according to them) for a new Toyota vehicle of equal or greater value than the one I now own.  They are willing to give me several thousand dollar, as a &#8220;coupon&#8221; on a new vehicle.  My vehicle is in excellent shape and probably has a good ten years of useful life left in it.  I of course declined.</p>
<p>If gas prices fall off their spike, I can only think that the rush to dump SUVs, perpetuated in good part by the media, will retrospectively be the next, closest, convenient way to jam more indebtedness down the throat of US consumers.  &#8220;Trade in that gas hog now!  It&#8217;s worthless!  Get a small car before it&#8217;s too late!  By the way, we&#8217;ve got a financing deal for ya!&#8221;</p>
<p>PS: My SUV - the one the media says is a dog - is now exactly three years old.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Forbes thinks <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/29/commuting-suburbs-future-lead-commuting08-cx_rb_0729bruegmann.html">the swan song of the SUV is overblown</a> too.</p>
<p>UPDATE 2: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/02/business/yourmoney/02money.html?ex=1375416000&amp;en=4e43c6ef45319332&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">Five reasons to keep that machine</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/25/nobody-loves-a-three-year-old-suv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airlines have nobody to blame but themselves</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fuel cost]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hedging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the midst of oil-mania, Southwest significantly hedged their fuel consumption.  Delta and American did not.
Guess who&#8217;s winning?
This is a management problem.  Hedging is NOT speculation - you shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;lose&#8221; because you hedge, as the cost of fuel should wind up fixed if the hedge is managed appropriately.  You determine your need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img src="http://www.southwest.com/images/ad_gallery/p_ad14.jpg" title="Southwest Airlines" alt="Southwest Airlines" class="alignright" border="0" height="150" width="120" />In the midst of oil-mania, Southwest significantly <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/07/16/airlines-the-oil-bubbles-winners-losers/">hedged their fuel consumption</a>.  Delta and American did not.</p>
<p>Guess who&#8217;s winning?</p>
<p>This is a management problem.  Hedging is NOT <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/search/?cx=011647838950087684899%3A1cxf6yucso8&amp;cof=FORID%3A11&amp;q=speculation&amp;sa=Search#952">speculation</a> - you shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;lose&#8221; because you hedge, as the cost of fuel should wind up fixed if the hedge is managed appropriately.  You determine your need for fuel, and figure out how that flows through to ticket price.  Then you purchase forward contracts for that fuel and fix your ticket price appropriately.  If fuel prices go up you take your gains on the contracts, which in turn offset your rising costs at consumption time.  If fuel prices go down, you lose on the contracts but your fuel price has fallen as you&#8217;re buying it.  Margin on your service stays the same, as you set your prices in advance.</p>
<p>Not hedging your fuel costs in this environment is the real speculation.  And I&#8217;ll add that those who do cover their butts have the addition perk of being able to raise their ticket prices (even if slightly) on the back&#8217;s of their competitors&#8217; misfortune without significantly effecting volume.</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/16/airports-amr-delta-biz-cx_tvr_0716airlines.html">Forbes says</a>: &#8220;The sky may not be falling for airlines just yet, but darker clouds could be just around the corner.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed (particularly if they don&#8217;t update their financial management tools to at least late 20th century levels).</p>
<p>UPDATE 2: Southwest turns its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/business/25air.html">69th consecutive profitable quarter</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/16/airlines-have-nobody-to-blame-but-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are We in the Peak of an Oil Bubble?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/09/are-we-in-the-peak-of-an-oil-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/09/are-we-in-the-peak-of-an-oil-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[supply]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/09/are-we-in-the-peak-of-an-oil-bubble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PhysOrg does a good job of convincing, at least for the short to intermediate term.
Since 2003, worldwide oil prices have quadrupled. According to a new study, the price of oil is rising at a faster-than-exponential rate, and cannot be sustained. In other words, we’re in the midst of an oil bubble, say researchers Didier Sornette [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelgracie/2654120707/" class="tt-flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3028/2654120707_4cac0be679_m.jpg" alt="Oil Supply/Demand/Price" class="alignright" border="0" height="178" width="240" /></a>PhysOrg does a <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news134646313.html">good job of convincing</a>, at least for the short to intermediate term.</p>
<blockquote><p>Since 2003, worldwide oil prices have quadrupled. According to a new study, the price of oil is rising at a faster-than-exponential rate, and cannot be sustained. In other words, we’re in the midst of an oil bubble, say researchers Didier Sornette and Ryan Woodard of ETH Zurich in Switzerland and Wei-Xing Zhou of the East China University of Science and Technology in Shanghai, China.</p></blockquote>
<p>Certainly goes against the <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/21/oils-no-bubble/">previous note</a> on the subject.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Gas consumption is dropping rapidly - <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/07/drivers-cut-gas.html">high prices are the cure for high prices</a>.  When will the commodities markets come unhinged?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/07/09/are-we-in-the-peak-of-an-oil-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-Afternoon Holiday Reading</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/26/mid-afternoon-holiday-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/26/mid-afternoon-holiday-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 21:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business model]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George Soros]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Societe Generale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/26/mid-afternoon-holiday-reading/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like a linkfest link barrage, only post-nap

George Soros says it&#8217;s an oil bubble; he could have been nice enough to comment here, instead of going straight to the mainstream media.  Still, speculation is rampant.
Jerome Kerviel didn&#8217;t act alone?  Once again, no surprise here.
Giving away your product, while praying, should not be part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><em>Like a <strike>linkfest</strike> <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/15/thursday-morning-link-barrage/">link barrage</a>, only post-<a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/26/a-sunday-streamer-night-out/">nap</a></em></p>
<ul>
<li>George Soros says it&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/05/26/cnsoros126.xml">oil bubble</a>; he could have been nice enough to <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/21/oils-no-bubble/">comment here</a>, instead of going straight to the mainstream media.  Still, <a href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/05/oil-speculation-debate.html">speculation</a> is rampant.</li>
<li>Jerome Kerviel <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/05/23/societe-generale-kerviel-biz-wallst-cx_pm_0523report.html">didn&#8217;t act alone</a>?  Once again, <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/01/24/rogue-trader-costs-bank-billions/">no</a> <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/02/08/court-puts-societe-generale-trader-in-jail/">surprise</a> <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/02/22/socgen-took-16-days-28-people-to-uncover-kerviel-lie/">here</a>.</li>
<li>Giving away your product, while <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080522/1545021204.shtml">praying</a>, should not be part of your business plan&#8217;s executive summary.   If that&#8217;s your strategy, then bury the praying part in notes to the projections (nobody ever looks at those).</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s cloudy/gloomy out&#8230;good weather for more napping.</p>
<p>UPDATE: If you decided to sleep too, there&#8217;s now more on the oil speculation bit <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/05/speculators-ii.html">here</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/26/mid-afternoon-holiday-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil&#8217;s No Bubble</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/21/oils-no-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/21/oils-no-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bubble]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/21/oils-no-bubble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per Forbes:
A new record $130 pales in comparison to long-term futures prices.
Actually, long-term futures prices aren&#8217;t all that scary, at least this moment (129 cash versus 142 for Dec. &#8216;16).  Crimminy&#8230;cash delivery could hit 142 next week!
Is it a bubble?
UPDATE: &#8220;It could be up ten or down ten short term&#8220;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Per <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/05/21/oil-euro-update-markets-commodities-cx_ll_cg_0521markets29.html">Forbes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A new record $130 pales in comparison to long-term futures prices.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, <a href="http://www2.barchart.com/dfutpage.asp?sym=CL&amp;code=BSTK&amp;section=energies">long-term futures prices</a> aren&#8217;t all that scary, at least this moment (129 cash versus 142 for Dec. &#8216;16).  Crimminy&#8230;cash delivery could hit 142 next week!</p>
<p>Is it <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/09/crude-oil-prices-1861-2008/">a bubble</a>?</p>
<p>UPDATE: &#8220;<a href="http://twitter.com/howardlindzon/statuses/817713166">It could be up ten or down ten short term</a>&#8220;</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/21/oils-no-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s crude oil craziness</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/20/todays-crude-oil-craziness/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/20/todays-crude-oil-craziness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/20/todays-crude-oil-craziness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a summary of nuttiness

Congress is nearing a quest to sue oil producing countries over prices.  Even if they won such a lawsuit, who would determine the damages, and who would enforce the judgement?  Is the Justice Department going to say &#8220;pay up, or you can&#8217;t export your oil to us anymore&#8221;?
It&#8217;s time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><em>Just a summary of nuttiness</em></p>
<ul>
<li>Congress is nearing a quest to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00953020080520?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true">sue oil producing countries</a> over prices.  Even if they won such a lawsuit, who would determine the damages, and who would enforce the judgement?  Is the Justice Department going to say &#8220;pay up, or you can&#8217;t export your oil to us anymore&#8221;?</li>
<li>It&#8217;s time to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aKA_xE8HjK_s&amp;refer=home">lay down further regulation of the commodities markets</a>.  Despite skyrocketing global demand (and <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080520/oil_prices.html?.v=8">blatant stockpiling on China&#8217;s part</a> in advance of the Olympics), the government still wants to blame everything on speculators.  Forget never ending trade deficits, soaring national debt, and a plummeting dollar&#8230;it&#8217;s time to further regulate the exchange of futures contracts by Joe Trader In The Bathrobe.</li>
</ul>
<p>What is going to happen when and if this bubble bursts?</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/05/peak-oil.html">Revisting peak oil</a> (seen the chart before, and I&#8217;d recommend downloading and looking at it on a big screen).</p>
<p>UPDATE 2: More <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3MgWEz_Qch0&amp;refer=home">blaming the traders</a>.</p>
<p>UPDATE 3: <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1154686">Hoarding</a> may be reality.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/20/todays-crude-oil-craziness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crude Oil Prices 1861 - 2008</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/09/crude-oil-prices-1861-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/09/crude-oil-prices-1861-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[price bubble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/09/crude-oil-prices-1861-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool graph, showing price in nominal and inflation adjusted (2008 dollar) terms.
And&#8230;it looks like a bubble.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2005/11/01/oil-prices-1861-today-real-vs-nominal_flash_print.html">Cool graph</a>, showing price in nominal and inflation adjusted (2008 dollar) terms.</p>
<p>And&#8230;it looks like a bubble.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/05/09/crude-oil-prices-1861-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
