<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; politicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/politicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Mortgage VIPs</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/25/mortgage-vips/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/25/mortgage-vips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[preferential treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/25/mortgage-vips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via WSJ:
Do all Washington politicians get their loans directly from CEOs in the mortgage industry? Readers might be wondering after learning about Countrywide Financial and its VIP treatment for Senators Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.) and Kent Conrad (D., N.D.)&#8230;
Mr. Conrad then recounted how he came to receive preferential treatment from the country&#8217;s largest mortgage lender. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Via <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121435046364101439.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">WSJ</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Do all Washington politicians get their loans directly from CEOs in the mortgage industry? Readers might be wondering after learning about Countrywide Financial and its VIP treatment for Senators Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.) and Kent Conrad (D., N.D.)&#8230;</p>
<p>Mr. Conrad then recounted how he came to receive preferential treatment from the country&#8217;s largest mortgage lender. The Senator evidently believes that his latest version of events, in which he gets a sweetheart mortgage from a CEO only after first contacting the former CEO of the largest wholesale purchaser of home mortgages, somehow makes his conduct appear more appropriate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Pffsst.  Aren&#8217;t these the same folks that are now trying to bail out the mortgage industry?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/06/25/mortgage-vips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Ugly in tech security</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/17/monday-ugly-in-tech-security/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/17/monday-ugly-in-tech-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/17/monday-ugly-in-tech-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like &#8220;Coyote Ugly,&#8221; but actually ugly:
First&#8230;hackers busted into the website of the US Consolate General in Russia.  As if the US didn&#8217;t have enough problems off shore&#8230;
&#8220;This latest attack highlights the fact that no organization is immune from infection, and that no matter what the size of the company, it must defend its webpages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><em>Like &#8220;Coyote Ugly,&#8221; but actually ugly:</em></p>
<p>First&#8230;<a href="http://www.securitypark.co.uk/security_article.asp?articleid=259904&#038;Categoryid=1">hackers busted into the website of the US Consolate General in Russia</a>.  As if the US didn&#8217;t have enough problems off shore&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This latest attack highlights the fact that no organization is immune from infection, and that no matter what the size of the company, it must defend its webpages fully to avoid being stung.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>No doubt there - attacks on <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/search/?cx=011647838950087684899%3A1cxf6yucso8&#038;cof=FORID%3A11&#038;q=institution&#038;sa=Search">institutions</a> are commonplace - it&#8217;s just that they have good PR teams to keep it hush hush.</p>
<p>Next&#8230;a <a href="http://www.cnet.com/surveillance-state/8301-13739_1-9779225-46.html">German onion router administrator gets arrested</a>.  Clearly not the guy&#8217;s problem, but getting arrested highlights the risks of running a Tor server in this day and age (as well as the cluelessness of some <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/?s=politician">politicians</a> regarding technology).  What&#8217;s Tor?  Inquiring minds check <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/Tor/">here</a> first.</p>
<p>Last but not least&#8230; a bunch of laptops were pre-loaded with Vista, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/17/vista_hit_by_stoned_angelina/">as well as a 13-year old boot sector virus</a>.  Plenty has already been said on Vista and it&#8217;s <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/search/?cx=011647838950087684899%3A1cxf6yucso8&#038;cof=FORID%3A11&#038;q=Vista&#038;sa=Search">security</a>.  But I can&#8217;t help but chuckle.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/09/17/monday-ugly-in-tech-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicos Rewrite Wikipedia &#8220;History&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/31/politicos-rewrite-wikipedia-history/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/31/politicos-rewrite-wikipedia-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians and their cohorts have once again proven they have little to do except cover their own butts.  They&#8217;ve spent who-knows-how-many-taxpayer-dollars making false entries in Wikipedia, never realizing that their tracks were glowing flourescent green on a dark wooded path.  The politicos still don&#8217;t get it, and they never will.  It takes, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><img alt="wikipedia.jpg" src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/wikipedia.jpg" width="68" height="78" vspace="3" hspace="3" align="right" border="0" />Politicians and their cohorts have once again proven they have little to do except cover their own butts.  They&#8217;ve spent who-knows-how-many-taxpayer-dollars <a title="Congress caught making false entries in Wikipedia | News.blog | CNET News.com" href="http://news.com.com/2061-10796_3-6033082.html?part=rss&#038;tag=6033082&#038;subj=news">making false entries in Wikipedia</a>, never realizing that their tracks were glowing flourescent green on a dark wooded path.  The politicos still <a title="Thought Market: Please get some tech help, Mr. Politico" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/11/30/please-get-some-tech-help-mr-politico/">don&#8217;t get it</a>, and they never will.  It takes, at minimum, amoebic intelligence to figure it out, but that is something they simply do not possess. </p>
<p><cite>&#8220;We already know, of course, that politicians live primarily for re-election and typically view the truth as an impediment to the higher purpose of unfettered self-aggrandizement,&#8221;</cite> said Declan McCullagh.</p>
<p>You may know, Mr. McCullagh, but most of the citizenry doesn&#8217;t quite get it yet.  However, given enough time, enough distribution channels, and enough idiocy, they will.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/01/31/politicos-rewrite-wikipedia-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch for &#8220;political appointments&#8221; out of the FTC</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/23/watch-for-political-appointments-out-of-the-ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/23/watch-for-political-appointments-out-of-the-ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CAN-SPAM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spamhaus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/watch-for-political-appointments-out-of-the-ftc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FTC has recently come out with a very long report detailing how CAN-SPAM is working.  Brian McWilliams pointed out that while they interviewed numerous people for the work, including folks at the Direct Marketing Association, they forgot to talk to Steve Linford over at Spamhaus.
While this is not a particularly strange omission (as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The FTC has recently come out with a very long report detailing how CAN-SPAM is working.  Brian McWilliams pointed out that while they interviewed numerous people for the work, including folks at the Direct Marketing Association, they <a title="Spam Kings Blog: FTC opts out of Spamhaus input" href="http://spamkings.oreilly.com/archives/2005/12/ftc_opts_out_of_spamhaus_input.html" target="">forgot to talk to Steve Linford</a> over at <a href="http://www.spamhaus.org" target="">Spamhaus</a>.</p>
<p>While this is not a particularly strange omission (as Brian notes Steve was not very happy with CAN-SPAM), I am more curious as to the cause of the sudden shift of gears.  The FTC was just saying <a title="Spamroll: Someone just realized CAN-SPAM doesn't work" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/06/21/someone-just-realized-can-spam-doesnt-work/" target="">CAN-SPAM wasn&#8217;t working too well</a> a few months ago.  Meanwhile, they have been <a title="Spamroll: FTC shuts down "Spoof-Spyware" software company" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/06/24/ftc-shuts-down-spoof-spyware-software-company/" target="">out and about</a>, <a title="Spamroll: FTC cracking pornheads in Florida" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/07/21/ftc-cracking-pornheads-in-florida/" target="">cracking heads</a>, and getting some decent PR as a result.  Cripes, they even <a title="Spamroll: Popping off too soon..." href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/11/11/popping-off-too-soon/" target="">even shut down a splog ring</a>!</p>
<p>Then a <a title="Spamroll: Couldn't have said it better" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/10/05/couldnt-have-said-it-better/" target="">turf war started</a> between the FTC and Congress, and now it looks like someone has caved.  All that comes out of Congress is noise, so they couldn&#8217;t have anyone lingering around doing something about the issue.  The FTC seems to be backing off (and spewing some sound of their own), and there is no doubt a few politicians will be waving this &#8220;report&#8221; around and taking the credit.  I wonder who is getting the next appointment.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/23/watch-for-political-appointments-out-of-the-ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining the next &#8220;Internet&#8221; for the worse</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/22/redefining-the-next-internet-for-the-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/22/redefining-the-next-internet-for-the-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[telcos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telecomm providers are running scared.  Shackled with old technology, piles of debt, and a thoughts of a bygone era, they continue along M&#038;A paths without a clue as to whether their actions will make things any better.  Certainly, much of the thinking isn&#8217;t going to change.
Threatened, the telcos turn to lobbyists (and in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Telecomm providers are running scared.  Shackled with old technology, piles of debt, and a thoughts of a bygone era, they continue along M&#038;A paths without a clue as to whether their actions <a title="Thought Market: Will the Recent Swathe of Telco Mergers Make Things Better?" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/02/15/will-the-recent-swathe-of-telco-mergers-make-things-better/">will make things any better</a>.  Certainly, much of <a title="Techdirt:BellSouth, AT&#038;T Cut From The Same Cloth" href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051201/1118238_F.shtml" target="">the thinking</a> isn&#8217;t going to change.</p>
<p>Threatened, the telcos turn to lobbyists (and in turn, Congress).  Lobbyists push <a title="IP Democracy" href="http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2005/12/21/index.php#a000928" target="">protectionist measures</a> on behalf of their clients.  Congress will <a title="Senators propose taxing Internet shopping | CNET News.com" href="http://news.com.com/Senators propose taxing Internet shopping/2100-1028_3-6004917.html" target="">propose taxation</a> and further <a title="Why the FCC will regulate the Internet | Computerworld Blogs" href="http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/1456" target="">regulation</a>.  Politicians will convince the general public that they have everyone&#8217;s best interests in mind, all to rein in the cowboys (like Google, Vonage, Amazon, and eBay).  They&#8217;ll captivate their audience with their &#8220;do-goodness,&#8221;  while they fly around on some telco company&#8217;s private jet to all the town hall meetings.<br />
<span id="more-205"></span><br />
What the public will wind up with is slow, cumbersome, expensive service.  The cowboys, sitting on beautiful balance sheets and a boatload of brainpower, will just innovate their way around it, and some early adopters will smile once again.  The financial markets are unforgiving too, and they will take notice.  A bunch of phone companies will wind up even more starved for capital as their asset base continues its path of depreciation and obsolescence.</p>
<p>When the telcos come back for another round of help, government will be kicking back - basking in self-defined wisdom and altruism - and and blaming the original targets for it all.  They&#8217;ll put their hand out for another plane ride, and we can start the whole process over.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/12/22/redefining-the-next-internet-for-the-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Find me the politician, and I will vote for him</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/10/26/find-me-the-politician-and-i-will-vote-for-him/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/10/26/find-me-the-politician-and-i-will-vote-for-him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plato call the four political virtues wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice.  I am hard pressed, off the top of my head, to think of a politician who holds them all dear, so I will break it down&#8230;


Wisdom
You have to know what is good, and how it applies to the bigger picture.  Thinking about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Plato call the four political virtues <cite>wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice</cite>.  I am hard pressed, off the top of my head, to think of a politician who holds them all dear, so I will break it down&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-131"></span><br />
<img src="http://www.michaelgracie.com/wp-content/oldsitepics/plato1.jpg" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5"></p>
<p><U>Wisdom</U></p>
<p>You have to know what is good, and how it applies to the bigger picture.  Thinking about how that good can enrich the community is the goal, not how to line your own pockets.  Not that there is anything wrong with lining your pockets, but business is the forum for that, not politics.</p>
<p><U>Temperance</U></p>
<p>Self-restraint is almost non-existent.  Huge ad budgets and rallies, and overly long-winded speeches talking about one&#8217;s self are hardly exemplary of moderation.  Drawn out wars (with &#8220;just trust me&#8221; reasons) and too many strange women in the Oval Office (at odd hours) do not cut it either.</p>
<p><U>Courage</U></p>
<p>Knowing the seriousness of the issues is one thing - risking your position to protect the good is quite another.  Few exercise on the latter, as it is just not &#8220;good politics.&#8221;  It is bowing to peer pressure in the climb to power which negates this virtue.  Makes you wonder why second-term presidencies are such a dismal failure nowadays.</p>
<p><U>Justice</U></p>
<p>There are few standards for right and wrong in today&#8217;s politics.  Laws are passed at the whims of those in power.  But there is enough mistreatment of others on the political scene to conclude that this virtue is a scarcity among those circulating that realm.</p>
<p>Any takers on all accounts?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>And as always, thanks go out to the contributors.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/10/26/find-me-the-politician-and-i-will-vote-for-him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tricky or viral - political email needs help</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/10/19/tricky-or-viral-political-email-needs-help/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/10/19/tricky-or-viral-political-email-needs-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The general consensus was that politicians didn&#8217;t have much of a clue what technology was all about.  Then Howard Dean raised a ton of funds via the internet, and everyone jumped on the bandwagon.  If I had a poll right now based on a political party&#8217;s use of technology as a gauge for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The general consensus was that politicians didn&#8217;t have much of a clue what technology was all about.  Then Howard Dean raised a ton of funds via the internet, and everyone jumped on the bandwagon.  If I had a poll right now based on a political party&#8217;s use of technology as a gauge for results, I&#8217;d say the Republicans were about to get their asses handed to them.  They are fumbling around with email lists and viral marketing concepts, and the effort is getting all messed up.<br />
<span id="more-122"></span><br />
Of course, they are <a title="Republican Party claims spam was a dirty trick | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/10/20/republican_party_claims_spam/">calling some latest barrage of spam a dirty trick</a>, and they actually could be right (no pun intended).  But when anyone starts pointing fingers, particularly in politics, I always assume they screwed something up and are trying to pass the blame.</p>
<p>Either way, lets hope its all a big mistake.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/10/19/tricky-or-viral-political-email-needs-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t buy anymore spam filtering software - the problem has been solved!</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/25/dont-buy-anymore-spam-filtering-software-the-problem-has-been-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/25/dont-buy-anymore-spam-filtering-software-the-problem-has-been-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[instant messaging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/dont-buy-anymore-spam-filtering-software-the-problem-has-been-solved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A major breakthrough has been made in the war on spam, one that might put the problem to rest for good.  Politicians from the US and UK have agreed to cross the pond every year for a spam summit.  According Derek Wyatt, head of the All Parliamentary Internet Group, &#8220;That will really help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>A major breakthrough has been made in the war on spam, one that might put the problem to rest for good.  Politicians from the US and UK have agreed to cross the pond every year for a spam summit.  According Derek Wyatt, head of the All Parliamentary Internet Group, &#8220;That will really help to beat things like spam and spim [spam over instant messaging].&#8221;</p>
<p>Rumour has it the first forum will address the following major issues:</p>
<p>- Statuatory requirements to set auto-emptying of Outlook junk mail folders upon exit, and<br />
- Allocating substantial funds (in the billions) to develop public awareness campaigns on how to restrict IMs only to those people on a personal buddy list</p>
<p>Great stuff!<br />
<span id="more-425"></span><br />
You can read the whole, exciting report here: <a title="Politicans form transatlantic spam alliance - ZDNet UK News" href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39192665,00.htm">Politicans form transatlantic spam alliance - ZDNet UK News</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/25/dont-buy-anymore-spam-filtering-software-the-problem-has-been-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicians: Spamming Enemy #1</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/11/politicians-spamming-enemy-1/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/11/politicians-spamming-enemy-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spammer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tony Blair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/politicians-spamming-enemy-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Blair is a spammer.  Everyone else has already covered this story, so I won&#8217;t say much more.  Politicians are worthy of very little of my CPU&#8217;s time.  Here you go: Scotsman.com News - Latest News - Prime Minister Accused of Sending Out Spam.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Tony Blair is a spammer.  Everyone else has already covered this story, so I won&#8217;t say much more.  Politicians are worthy of very little of my CPU&#8217;s time.  Here you go: <a title="Scotsman.com News - Latest News - Prime Minister Accused of Sending Out Spam" href="http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=4236524">Scotsman.com News - Latest News - Prime Minister Accused of Sending Out Spam</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/11/politicians-spamming-enemy-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
