<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Inconspicuous Consumption</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/08/06/inconspicuous-consumption/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/08/06/inconspicuous-consumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=2663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virginia Postrel:
As peer groups get richer, the balance between private pleasure and publicly visible consumption shifts&#8230;
Their primary luxuries [become] time and attention.
You have to cut through the racial typing to get the meat of the issue, and I&#8217;m sure some folks will get it right away.  But I am curious - if time is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/consumption">Virginia Postrel</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>As peer groups get richer, the balance between private pleasure and publicly visible consumption shifts&#8230;</p>
<p>Their primary luxuries [become] time and attention.</p></blockquote>
<p>You have to cut through the racial typing to get the meat of the issue, and I&#8217;m sure some folks will get it right away.  But I am curious - if time is the new luxury, why do so many waste it sipping lattes in urban Starbucks?</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/08/06/inconspicuous-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Magazine doesn&#8217;t know jack</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/time-magazine-doesnt-know-jack/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/time-magazine-doesnt-know-jack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[user-generated content]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[zombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/time-magazine-doesnt-know-jack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Magazine punted this year, and declared their &#8220;Person of the Year&#8221; was you.  Yes, you.  It was supposedly the year of user generated content - unfortunately, the magazine missed the boat.  They forgot that all the user generated content sucks (Spamroll included) - everyone creating that content was too busy fighting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Time Magazine punted this year, and declared their &#8220;Person of the Year&#8221; was you.  Yes, you.  It was supposedly the year of user generated content - unfortunately, the magazine missed the boat.  They forgot that all the user generated content sucks (Spamroll included) - everyone creating that content was too busy fighting viruses to producing anything of value.</p>
<p>Damn it, 2006 wasn&#8217;t the year of user generated content - it was <a title="2006 Declared Year Of The Zombies - Technology News by TechWeb" href="http://www.techweb.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=196702107">was the Year of the Zombies</a>!</p>
<p><small>Well, maybe Time did get it right; they just didn&#8217;t know it.</small></p>
<p>UPDATE: Even Microsoft <a title="Computerworld - Microsoft sees botnets as top cyber-threat" href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id%3b547354790%3bfp%3b4%3bfpid%3b16">gets it</a>.  Now, let&#8217;s see if they do something about it, since last time I checked Linux and OS X installs weren&#8217;t getting hijacked too often.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/12/28/time-magazine-doesnt-know-jack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
