<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Gracie &#187; viruses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelgracie.com/tag/viruses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelgracie.com</link>
	<description>Clever Tagline Unavailable At Publication Time</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Facebook Spam Getting Worse?</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/08/27/facebook-spam-getting-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/08/27/facebook-spam-getting-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/?p=3011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company says they have the problem under control, but it&#8217;s probably just the first inning for Facebook spam.
Bound to happen sooner or later.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>The company says they have the problem under control, but it&#8217;s probably just the first inning for <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/8/facebook-spam-getting-worse-">Facebook spam</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2007/07/28/dont-count-on-facebook-to-be-spamscam-free-either/">Bound to happen</a> sooner or later.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2008/08/27/facebook-spam-getting-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers battered by viral storm</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/31/bloggers-battered-by-viral-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/31/bloggers-battered-by-viral-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/31/bloggers-battered-by-viral-storm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should read &#8220;Bloggers battered by viral storm&#8220;, but that wouldn&#8217;t really be news.
Meanwhile, all&#8217;s quiet on the &#8220;kick &#8216;em crew front (maybe because they&#8217;re all using Wordpress and OpenAds).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Should read &#8220;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6970368.stm">Blogger<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">s</span> battered by viral storm</a>&#8220;, but that wouldn&#8217;t really be news.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, all&#8217;s quiet on the <a href="http://michaelgracie.com/2007/07/11/kicking-squidoo-when-its-down/">&#8220;kick &#8216;em crew</a> front (maybe because they&#8217;re all using Wordpress and OpenAds).</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2007/08/31/bloggers-battered-by-viral-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popularity of anti-virus software becoming their handicap</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/23/popularity-of-anti-virus-software-becoming-their-handicap/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/23/popularity-of-anti-virus-software-becoming-their-handicap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/popularity-of-anti-virus-software-becoming-their-handicap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virus creators are using popular anti-virus packages as testbeds for their malware, meaning the most popular tools are going to be useless for immediate protection.
I think this is actually good news for the security sector, as it creates more competition grounded in innovation.  If smaller, niche vendors can make it by proving they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Virus creators are using popular anti-virus packages <a title="Why popular antivirus apps 'do not work': ZDNet Australia: Blogs: Securify This!" href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/blogs/securifythis/soa/Why_popular_antivirus_apps_do_not_work_/0,39033341,39264249,00.htm" target="">as testbeds for their malware</a>, meaning the most popular tools are going to be useless for immediate protection.</p>
<p>I think this is actually good news for the security sector, as it creates more competition grounded in innovation.  If smaller, niche vendors can make it by proving they are a needed supplement to popular packages, they drive down prices.  Virus authors still need to find ways to spread their creations, and the increased customization targeting an ever shrinking number of security holes is not going to solve that dilemma.  Popular anti-virus products protect the broad base, which includes distribution exploits.</p>
<p>Let the little guy cover the back door.  Meanwhile, we all win.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/07/23/popularity-of-anti-virus-software-becoming-their-handicap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over half of all PCs may be doomed</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/13/over-half-of-all-pcs-may-be-doomed/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/13/over-half-of-all-pcs-may-be-doomed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/over-half-of-all-pcs-may-be-doomed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doomed to get upgrades, that is.  If Steve Ballmer can&#8217;t get the infections fixed, who can?
Microsoft just released a report that says 60% of all PCs are infected with some virus, malware, etc.  Yikes.  However, all is not lost, timely as it may be.  Hackers will get a sneak peek at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Doomed to get upgrades, that is.  If Steve Ballmer <a title="Spamroll: Microsoft tempts fate, as Ballmer struggles with it" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2006/06/06/microsoft-tempts-fate-as-ballmer-struggles-with-it/" target="">can&#8217;t get the infections fixed</a>, who can?</p>
<p>Microsoft just released a report that says <a title="E-Commerce News: Security : Microsoft's Malware Report: 60 Percent of PCs Infected" href="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/mmLKSAiIkenf8Q/Microsofts-Malware-Report-60-Percent-of-PCs-Infected.xhtml" target="">60% of all PCs are infected with some virus, malware, etc.</a>  Yikes.  However, all is not lost, timely as it may be.  Hackers will get a <a title="Microsoft Has a Big Date Set with 'Black Hat ' Hackers  " href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1976171,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="">sneak peek at Vista security features</a> really soon.  That way, they can crack it silly in 30 seconds, Vista can get delayed until 2009, and you won&#8217;t have to upgrade.</p>
<p>Ha.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/06/13/over-half-of-all-pcs-may-be-doomed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two reports on threats, just one week late</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/08/two-reports-on-threats-just-one-week-late/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/08/two-reports-on-threats-just-one-week-late/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 12:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[worms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/two-reports-on-threats-just-one-week-late/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have been lazy lately - or is that busy - I can&#8217;t tell which.  First report - Sophos&#8217;s Top Ten malware threats for April 2006; second up - MXLogic&#8217;s latest on email worms and viruses.
The Spamroll summary - Netsky rules, and email worms need less interesting names.  Needless to say, these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>So I have been lazy lately - or is that busy - I can&#8217;t tell which.  First report - <a title="Top ten malware threats and hoaxes reported to Sophos in April 2006" href="http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2006/05/toptenapr06.html" target="">Sophos&#8217;s Top Ten malware threats for April 2006</a>; second up - <a title="03_14_06_petro" href="http://www.mxlogic.com/news_events/press_releases/05_03_06_malcryption.html" target="">MXLogic&#8217;s latest on email worms and viruses</a>.</p>
<p>The Spamroll summary - Netsky rules, and email worms need less interesting names.  Needless to say, these threat games are more than about fun - the perpetrators <a title="70% of Malware Detected Related to Cyber Crime - IT Observer" href="http://www.ebcvg.com/news/6246/70_malware_detected_related_cyber_crime/" target="">are focusing in on pay days</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2006/05/08/two-reports-on-threats-just-one-week-late/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You could be a convert too</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/08/you-could-be-a-convert-too/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/08/you-could-be-a-convert-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/you-could-be-a-convert-too/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AppleInsider reports that roughly a million Windows users have switched to Mac so far in 2005.  Call the report biased, but investment bank Needham &#038; Company was the source, and the news doesn&#8217;t surprise me.
While most folks will claim the computer purchases are part of the iPod &#8220;halo effect,&#8221; a Needham analyst said &#8220;a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>AppleInsider reports that roughly <a title="AppleInsider | Over 1 million Windows to Mac converts so far in 2005?" href="http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1360">a million Windows users have switched to Mac so far in 2005</a>.  Call the report biased, but investment bank Needham &#038; Company was the source, and the news doesn&#8217;t surprise me.</p>
<p>While most folks will claim the computer purchases are part of the iPod &#8220;halo effect,&#8221; a Needham analyst said <cite>&#8220;a larger than expected percentage of Windows to Mac converts appear to be purchasing Apple&#8217;s higher-end systems and that their transition is fueled by the epidemic of viruses and malware on the Windows platform.&#8221;</cite></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care for the iPod too much.  I&#8217;ve owned two that I found less than exciting and subsequently passed on.  I did purchase a Powerbook, however, <a title="Thought Market: Burning a hole in my pocket, but I don't care" href="http://www.michaelgracie.com/2005/02/11/burning-a-hole-in-my-pocket-but-i-dont-care/">thinking it a bit frivolous at first</a>, and wondering seven months later how I ever went without.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/11/08/you-could-be-a-convert-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can&#8217;t catch a break</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/07/30/cant-catch-a-break/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/07/30/cant-catch-a-break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/cant-catch-a-break/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viral attacks in the UK dropped slightly in the latest month, but no matter.  Phishing attacks continue to soar, along with spam volumes.  Furthermore, the time between virus releases and patch availability is still narrow, making it difficult to defend against viruses without additional upfront mail filters checking things out as well.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Viral attacks in the UK dropped slightly in the latest month, but no matter.  <a title="Phishing attacks soar as viral onslaught wanes | The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/29/blackspider_malware_report/">Phishing attacks continue to soar</a>, along with spam volumes.  Furthermore, the time between virus releases and patch availability is still narrow, making it difficult to defend against viruses without additional upfront mail filters checking things out as well.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/07/30/cant-catch-a-break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smartphones better get PhDs</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/06/23/smartphones-better-get-phds/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/06/23/smartphones-better-get-phds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/smartphones-better-get-phds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphones are a wave of the future, there is no doubt.  While I disagree with the need for them to play music, just about everything else (including address book management, calendaring, PIM syncing, etc.) can make busy peoples&#8217; lives a whole lot easier.
Of course, personal computers did that too.  And we know what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Smartphones are a wave of the future, there is no doubt.  While I disagree with the need for them to play music, just about everything else (including address book management, calendaring, PIM syncing, etc.) can make busy peoples&#8217; lives a whole lot easier.</p>
<p>Of course, personal computers did that too.  And we know what has turned into - a plethora of hacking, viruses, spyware, malware, spam, and other such nasties that keep Spamroll in existence.</p>
<p>You know where I am headed with this, so I&#8217;ll say little more.  Experts are predicting <a title="Clock's ticking on phone virus outbreak, experts say | CNET News.com" href="http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5756428.html">huge outbreaks of smartphone viruses within a few years</a>.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/06/23/smartphones-better-get-phds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Viruses for April 2005</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/05/06/top-ten-viruses-for-april-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/05/06/top-ten-viruses-for-april-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 14:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spamroll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hoaxes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sophos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/top-ten-viruses-for-april-2005/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the top ten viruses and hoaxes, as reported by Sophos, for April 2005: Top Ten Viruses and Hoaxes.
Zafi-D still tops in the running for viruses, while the Hotmail account notification takes the cake in the hoax department.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Here are the top ten viruses and hoaxes, as reported by Sophos, for April 2005: <a title="Kansas City infoZine - Top Ten Viruses and Hoaxes Reported to Sophos in April 2005 - USA" href="http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/7564/">Top Ten Viruses and Hoaxes</a>.</p>
<p>Zafi-D still tops in the running for viruses, while the Hotmail account notification takes the cake in the hoax department.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/05/06/top-ten-viruses-for-april-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On OS X security, I take nothing for granted</title>
		<link>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/22/on-os-x-security-i-take-nothing-for-granted/</link>
		<comments>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/22/on-os-x-security-i-take-nothing-for-granted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gracie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtmarket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Norton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virus protection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelgracie.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a post from Slashdot about Apple OS X, and thought about all the folks who just don&#8217;t get computer security, and never will.  It will be a constant battle to keep their machines virus free.  The problem is, security is not so hard to get.

In Mac OS X Becoming a Malware [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>I read a post from Slashdot about Apple OS X, and thought about all the folks who just don&#8217;t get computer security, and never will.  It will be a constant battle to keep their machines virus free.  The problem is, security is not so hard to get.<br />
<span id="more-68"></span><br />
In <a title="Slashdot | Symantec: Mac OS X Becoming a Malware Target" href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/0055237&#038;from=rss">Mac OS X Becoming a Malware Target</a>, several posters suggested that the original commentary from Symantec was marketing FUD, designed to get more folks who use Apples to buy their products.  Meanwhile, the battle between the opt-in features of XP SP1 security continues to rage, despite the fact SP2 solves these issues.</p>
<p>Yes, OS X&#8217;s base security features are on by default.  But that, like with any other OS, should not make Apple users complacent.</p>
<p>When I bought my Powerbook, I asked a colleague what virus protection they used.  I was looking for a recommendation, and I got &#8220;none&#8221; for an answer.  I immediately picked up Norton for Mac.  It never crossed my mind that my new machine would be safe, just because it was a Mac.  But it seems to cross many others&#8217;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what OS you use.  If you don&#8217;t take at least minimal measures to secure your computers, you can and will get hit, sooner or later.</p>
<!-- sphereit end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelgracie.com/2005/03/22/on-os-x-security-i-take-nothing-for-granted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
